IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
I. JURISDICTION & STANDING
This Court has the ability to hear standalone petitions for emergency relief in the first instance as the court with original jurisdiction over all civil matters arising under...
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY FOR RECUSAL
Your Honors,
My client also happens to be the sole sitting Magistrate. As it would be a comically fatal conflict of interest for my client to hear his own case, his case cannot currently be heard by any Magistrate...
AMENDMENT 04
Should the associated Motion to Amend pass, the Standing Orders of Parliament shall be amended in the manner described below.
§1(6) shall be amended in the following manner:
§6(3) shall be amended in the following manner, leaving each sub-clause unchanged:
The following...
IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO AMEND COMPLAINT
I. REQUESTED CHANGES
CHANGE 1: Plaintiff wishes to amend Section III. Facts of the Initial Complaint in the following manner:
CHANGE 2: Plaintiff wishes to amend Section IV. CLAIM FOR RELIEF in the following...
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Your Honor,
Plaintiff seeks leave from the Court to amend Part IV. Claim for Relief in our initial civil complaint in the following manner:
Respectfully submitted,
Capt B. Numbers
Attorney-in-Chief, Alliance...
IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
Alliance 25/The Greens for Alexandria, Plaintiff
vs.
The Crown of Alexandria, Defendant
I. JURISDICTION & STANDING
K. A. Const. Art. 16 provides that the Magistrates’ Court is the proper venue for this case, as it is a...
IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
Soggeh T. Oast, Plaintiff
v.
Crown of Alexandria, Defendant
I. JURISDICTION & STANDING
The Magistrates’ Court is the proper venue for this case under K. A. Const. Part III §16, as this case is a non-Constitutional...
IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO NOLLE PROSEQUI
Your Honors,
Plaintiff's Counsel does not necessarily support every claim made in the Crown's Entreaty to Dismiss. However, for his own reasons, the Plaintiff does not wish to continue this case.
Thanks to the existence...
IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
.Farmerkalechip, Plaintiff
v.
Crown of Alexandria, Defendant
I. JURISDICTION & STANDING APPLICATION
The Chancery has original jurisdiction to hear this case pursuant to K. A. Const. Part III §15, as this case concerns the...
IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
OPENING STATEMENT
Your Honors, this is a simple case with a plain outcome. The parties agree on the facts: a vacancy in Parliament opened on July 20, and was filled on July 31, over 10 days later. The parties even agree that the law requires a...
IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO ENTREATY TO DISMISS
Your Honors, Plaintiffs vehemently oppose the Crown's Entreaty to Dismiss.
Plaintiffs unfortunately cannot contest the facts surrounding the prayer for reimbursement of legal fees. However, the Crown has packaged...
IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY FOR CONTINUANCE
Your Honors,
Plaintiffs seek an additional 24 hours of continuance on top of the continuance requested previously, as we must now respond to the Crown's Entreaty to Dismiss (Alliance 25 / The Greens for Alexandria v. Crown...
IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
BRIEF REGARDING ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Your Honors, Plaintiffs reassert that this case's proper venue is the Chancery, pursuant to this Court's original jurisdiction over electoral questions.
I. CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS
Plaintiffs seek to direct the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.