Lawsuit: Pending ko531 v. The Crown, Case 16 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

ko531

ko531

New member
ko531
ko531
State Prosecutor
Joined
Apr 12, 2025
Messages
21
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION

Ko531
Plaintiff

v.

The Crown
Defendant

INTRODUCTION
I, ko531, made a FOI request on August 28th, 2025 towards the MOJ into the contents on the #Exec-crown chat as is the outlined process in the Government Information Act. At first, the Prime Minister (GoldBlooded) deemed the channel classifed. After asking some questions the MOJ would later admit that the channel could not be classified as it was not under the Parliament or a Ministry. The representative of the MOJ Ibney then decided to make a reasonable effort as to follow the law by asking the Prime Minister "pretty please give him what he is asking for" which the Prime Minister would then denied. The result of this ticket, as Ibney subsequently agreed, means that no FOI request actually has to be fufilled. This is a breach of the Government Information act by both the Prime Minister refusing to provide all unclassified information and a member of parliament withholding information permanently. This court should correct this blantent disrespect of the law by forcing the content of the #Exec-Crown Channel to be released.


I. PARTIES
1. Ko531
2. The Crown

II. FACTS
1. The Government Information Act section 8(2)(a) states: "A Freedom of Information request made by an individual citizen is made towards the Ministry of Justice. The Ministry of Justice is then expected to make a reasonable attempt to provide all non-classified requested information."
2. On August 28th, 2025 I, ko531, made a FOI request into the contents of the #Exec-Crown chat.
3. This request would be denied by the Prime Minister GoldBlooded due to it's classification status
4. A representative and Solicitor General of the MOJ Ibney agreed the chat is an independent channel that could not be classified.
5. Ibney while representing the MOJ made a "reasonable request" towards Goldblooded by asking "pretty please give him what he's asking for"
6. Prime Minister Goldblooded would still denied this request due to it not falling under "parliament or cabinet information" while also questioning the reasonability of the request due to its length.
7. Previously the MOJ has granted an unrelated FOI requests I have made totally 101 pages of discord discussions.
8. The MOJ is required to make a reasonable attempt to provide all non-classified requested information and not just parliament or cabinet information.
9. The Prime Minister is a member of Parliament
10. The Government Information Act section 8(1) states "Parliament directly represents the people in government. Therefore Parliament does not have the power to permanently withhold information from the public"

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Section 9(3) of the Government Information act states: "Any citizen or government body with a significant interest in classified information can request the Magistrates Court to determine whether or not said information is justly classified. This request pertains to all classifications."
2. Section 8(1) of the Government Information act states: " Parliament directly represents the people in government. Therefore Parliament does not have the power to permanently withhold information from the public." Goldblooded as a member of Parliament is breaching this section by permanently withholding information from the public that his MOJ claimed to not be classified.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. Release of all discussions in the #Exec-Crown channel
2. $1,000 in legal fees.

V. EVIDENCE
1756535728563.png
1756535764673.png
1756535800782.png
1756535824821.png
1756535853202.png
1756535867609.png
1756535910791.png
1756535942213.png
1756535966723.png
1756536000544.png
1756536024060.png
 

Attachments

  • 1756535988491.png
    1756535988491.png
    21.6 KB · Views: 9
MCA.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Queen's rightfully appointed Government are required to appear before the Magistrates' Court In the case of
ko531 v. The Crown, Case 16 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons may result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

All parties will make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures (General and Magistrates).​
 
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO DISMISS

Your honour,

Under the General Court Rules and Procedures, the Crown entreats this Court to dismiss this case for lack of claim. The Government Information Act ("GIA") provides no method for the Magistrate Court to release information to the public. Under your honours previous ruling, the magistrate court may only lower the classification level of specific information if it is improperly classified. Ko531 v. The Crown, Case 8 (Mag.Ct., 2025).

Plaintiff brings suit to compel the release of all information within the #exec-crown channel. They cite zero authority which requires the government to do so. Instead, they cite that "Parliament" can not withhold information permanently from its people. See GIA Sec. 8(1). Prime Minister Goldblooded, believe it or not, is not Parliament. They are a member of parliament, but they are not refusing to release this information in their position as a member of parliament. They are the Prime Minister, and their discussions with the Monarch are within their official capacity as Prime Minister.

The Plaintiff may attempt to claim that they are a Minister of a Ministry, and claim that under GIA Sec. (1)(c) the information must be released because there is a new Prime Minister, this is not true either. While the Prime Minister is a Minister, he does not run a Ministry:

All Ministers serve at the pleasure of the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister does not expressly have the powers of the several other Ministers, but has the authority to order the other Ministers to effectuate their power as they see fit and within the confines of the Constitution or as prescribed by law.
Click to expand...

Government Organization Act ("GOA"), Part III, Sec. 10 (2).

The Prime Minister possesses no Ministry of their own. They also technically possess no individual power of those Ministries. Instead, they only have the power to order certain Ministers to do specific things under law, and fire them if they fail to do so.

The GIA is highly flawed. Your honour realized that after the previous case. I personally have already submitted legislation to fix it, but at the moment, the plaintiff has no recourse, and lacks a claim for which relief can be sought. Continuing this case would waste everyone's time. Because of this, we ask that you dismiss the plaintiff's claim with prejudice, or in the alternative, without prejudice and order him to submit a claim for which relief may be sought if he chooses to submit again.

Respectfully submitted,

Joseph Ibney0
Solicitor General
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
Ibney0 said:
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO DISMISS

Your honour,

Under the General Court Rules and Procedures, the Crown entreats this Court to dismiss this case for lack of claim. The Government Information Act ("GIA") provides no method for the Magistrate Court to release information to the public. Under your honours previous ruling, the magistrate court may only lower the classification level of specific information if it is improperly classified. Ko531 v. The Crown, Case 8 (Mag.Ct., 2025).

Plaintiff brings suit to compel the release of all information within the #exec-crown channel. They cite zero authority which requires the government to do so. Instead, they cite that "Parliament" can not withhold information permanently from its people. See GIA Sec. 8(1). Prime Minister Goldblooded, believe it or not, is not Parliament. They are a member of parliament, but they are not refusing to release this information in their position as a member of parliament. They are the Prime Minister, and their discussions with the Monarch are within their official capacity as Prime Minister.

The Plaintiff may attempt to claim that they are a Minister of a Ministry, and claim that under GIA Sec. (1)(c) the information must be released because there is a new Prime Minister, this is not true either. While the Prime Minister is a Minister, he does not run a Ministry:



Government Organization Act ("GOA"), Part III, Sec. 10 (2).

The Prime Minister possesses no Ministry of their own. They also technically possess no individual power of those Ministries. Instead, they only have the power to order certain Ministers to do specific things under law, and fire them if they fail to do so.

The GIA is highly flawed. Your honour realized that after the previous case. I personally have already submitted legislation to fix it, but at the moment, the plaintiff has no recourse, and lacks a claim for which relief can be sought. Continuing this case would waste everyone's time. Because of this, we ask that you dismiss the plaintiff's claim with prejudice, or in the alternative, without prejudice and order him to submit a claim for which relief may be sought if he chooses to submit again.

Respectfully submitted,

Joseph Ibney0
Solicitor General
Kingdom of Alexandria
Click to expand...
Permission to respond your honor?
 
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO ENTREATY TO DISMISS

Your Honor,

The Crown claims that the court has no ability to release such information but this is false. The court always has the ability to force compliance with the law which is exactly what I am asking the court to do. The Prime Minister is a member of parliament and is required to uphold the standards set for parliament. By this refusal to release the request information he is in clear violation of section 8(1) of the Government Information act. It is wordplay to say that the Prime Minister is not parliament but a member of parliament and only invites the breaking of the law. Parliament is made up by members of parliament. Without members of parliament there is no parliament and vice versa. There should be no distiction as one does not exist without the other By making such distiction means that members of parliament do not have to follow the law in regards to the parliament.

This denial of unclassified information goes completely against the nature of the Government Information Act and it should be corrected. The government should not have tha ability to ignore and violate the law. If this court were to dismiss this case, the Government Information Act would be informally rescinded. The request was not denied due to being an unreasonable request or due to its classified nature but because of reasons that are never once said inside the Government Information Act. The Prime Minister of all people should uphold the law, not ignore it and enforce what doesn't exist.
 
ko531 said:
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO ENTREATY TO DISMISS

Your Honor,

The Crown claims that the court has no ability to release such information but this is false. The court always has the ability to force compliance with the law which is exactly what I am asking the court to do. The Prime Minister is a member of parliament and is required to uphold the standards set for parliament. By this refusal to release the request information he is in clear violation of section 8(1) of the Government Information act. It is wordplay to say that the Prime Minister is not parliament but a member of parliament and only invites the breaking of the law. Parliament is made up by members of parliament. Without members of parliament there is no parliament and vice versa. There should be no distiction as one does not exist without the other By making such distiction means that members of parliament do not have to follow the law in regards to the parliament.

This denial of unclassified information goes completely against the nature of the Government Information Act and it should be corrected. The government should not have tha ability to ignore and violate the law. If this court were to dismiss this case, the Government Information Act would be informally rescinded. The request was not denied due to being an unreasonable request or due to its classified nature but because of reasons that are never once said inside the Government Information Act. The Prime Minister of all people should uphold the law, not ignore it and enforce what doesn't exist.
Click to expand...
Because plaintiff brings up points he states no where in his original complaint, I feel compelled to request a reply.
 
Ibney0 said:
Because plaintiff brings up points he states no where in his original complaint, I feel compelled to request a reply.
Click to expand...

Objection


Procedural Breach

Even though nothing outlining this in any court rules to my knowledge, it is general procedure that only one response is allowed. Almost never is a response to a response allowed as it opens up the possibility to indefinite responses. This request should be denied.

 
ko531 said:

Objection


Procedural Breach

Even though nothing outlining this in any court rules to my knowledge, it is general procedure that only one response is allowed. Almost never is a response to a response allowed as it opens up the possibility to indefinite responses. This request should be denied.

Click to expand...
Your honour, plaintiff points to no procedural rule that would disallow such. The Court has discretion to deny a reply if it becomes frivolous. Plaintiff outlined arguments not within their original complaint. To deny the defense the ability to respond to those arguments would allow plaintiff's to hide arguments outside of their complaint. Either the Court allows a response, or we request you do not consider this section of plaintiff's argument:

This denial of unclassified information goes completely against the nature of the Government Information Act and it should be corrected. The government should not have tha ability to ignore and violate the law. If this court were to dismiss this case, the Government Information Act would be informally rescinded. The request was not denied due to being an unreasonable request or due to its classified nature but because of reasons that are never once said inside the Government Information Act. The Prime Minister of all people should uphold the law, not ignore it and enforce what doesn't exist.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top