I'll rule on the objections after the Crown has replied to all of them (or doesn't reply and 24 hours have elapsed), in order to keep things organized.
@WonderRuby @ConsequencesInc @emilypancakes22 are hereby summoned to present witness testimony in the case of The Crown v. Thritystone & 12700k, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026).
You have 72 48 hours to make yourself known before the Court.
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
ORDER TO RE-RUN GENERAL ELECTION
The Crown v. Thritystone & 12700k, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026).
It does not please me to make this ruling.
I will begin by stating that both defendants are still afforded the full presumption of innocence offered to any...
With that ruling, we now move on to Opening Statements.
The Crown has 72 hours to present theirs. Immediately following that, both counselors for Thritystone and 12700k may present their Opening Statements. Please ping Nim and SrICEKING when you have posted yours.
@SoggehToast @Capt11543...
Denied. Discovery has ended. Proceedings are currently paused due to waiting on a ruling from a higher court.
Crown has 24 hours to respond.
@Capt11543 @SoggehToast @ColonelKai
Denied. The defendant was perfectly capable of asking for an extension to the initial deadline. The sanction remains in effect.
Denied. The argument presented that evidence collected in DemocracyCraft should not be useful in StateCraft is an intriguing one, but it is one I shall rule on during...
The Crown has 24 hours to respond to this Entreaty.
The previous order regarding filing Opening Statements is to be considered null and void. I shall request them once more when Discovery has concluded.
Councilor, you have eyes. You should be perfectly capable of discerning that 12700k...
Alright. Your client will still face a fine for Contempt of Court for missing the initial deadline (100 SC pounds).
We'll reopen Discovery for 72 hours, or we can end it sooner if both parties agree.
@ColonelKai @SrICEKING
12700k has failed to present their plea. As they had previously made themselves known to this court, and they are currently an active player on Statecraft, they will be subject to default judgement, to be ruled on at the conclusion of the case.
@ColonelKai @Capt11543 @SoggehToast You have 72...
Granted.
The matter of Crown v. Muggy21 , Case 21 (Mag. Ct., 2025) is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The court thanks all involved.
So ordered,
Magistrate AmityBlamity
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.