Username: Smallfries
Plot R-1-YORK-ST
Link to Eviction Report https://www.mcstatecraft.com/threads/r-1-york-st-mar-30-2026.913/
Deferral Length 3 days
Reason I have taken effective title of this plot. The reason for its eviction is no longer valid.
Agreement
I understand that I...
Username (In-game, as well as discord if different): Smallfries4 (Smallfries)
Judicial/Legal Experience: Chancellor and High Chancellor in Alexandria, Associate Justice and Chief Justice in Redmont. I'll list out litigated cases/presided-over cases if requested.
Why do you want to be appointed...
IN THE CHANCERY OF
THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Crown's rightfully appointed counsel is instructed to appear within seventy-two hours.
In a 2-0 decision, the Chancery dismisses this case. It is clear the plaintiff re-filed this suit in its entirety, adding new plaintiffs.
In the future, the Chancery asks in similar situations plaintiffs simply move to add other plaintiffs.
Discovery is now over.
Given the extended time that has elapsed since any movement from this proceeding, in a 2-0 vote the Chancery has decided to deny all outstanding motions. Parties are free to re-file any motion without penalty or scorn.
Discovery submission P-009 is invalid, as it was...
I'm sorry, but as a private citizen suing in a private matter, you do not have standing to ask for clarification on this subject. It is a matter wholly unrelated to you and your issues here.
IN THE CHANCERY OF
THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO WRIT
Defendant here asks the Chancery to recuse Magistrate Gribble19 for "bias and past encounters." The Defendant has provided no evidence of such bias or record of such encounters. I have absolutely no evidence, record, or justification...
This case has no presiding officer, and none can be assigned as only one seat is filled in the Chancery. No answer can be given to this request. If Parliament appoints a second uninterested Chancellor, or gives me authority to either rule on my own or promulgate new rules as I see fit, this case...
This objection is sustained in part. The Crown is clearly late in their response, and did not ask for an extension. While the Court understands very clearly the manpower issues and is sympathetic, it is necessary to hold the Crown in contempt, and fine them £100. However, it would be ridiculous...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.