Search results

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA QUESTIONS FOR WITNESSES Thank you all for your participation. I have some questions to get us started. For @emilypancakes22: 1. A conversation you had with Defendant 12700k has been admitted into evidence. See P-013 through P-016. What...

LABOUR/PUBLIC SERVANTS I. DECLARATION I, Secretary-General of LPS SoggehToast, do hereby declare the following Labour/Public Servants (LPS) candidates who will stand for Parliament: SoggehToast* Capt11543 MrRoyaltys Pepecuu II. MANIFESTO Labour/Public Servants' political goals are outlined in...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO ENTREATY OF STRIKING Your Honor, This Entreaty of Striking is questionable for several reasons. First, the Defense appears to treat the explanatory language in the Owner Veto as a binding factual determination. It is not. The...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA OPENING STATEMENT I. INTRODUCTION Two candidates seeking positions in Parliament, an institution of profound public trust and responsibility, attempted, both independently and in a coordinated scheme, to purchase our democracy. Today, these...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO MOTION TO EXCLUDE WITNESS TESTIMONY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO REOPEN DISCOVERY I. ENTREATIES TO COMPEL CONCERN EXISTING EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION Entreaties to compel are limited to evidence and information already in the Crown's...

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA DISCOVERY WITNESS LIST Your Honor, The Crown hereby submits the following witnesses for testimony: - WonderRuby - emilypancakes22 - ConsequencesInc Respectfully submitted, Soggeh T. Oast Minister of Justice Kingdom of Alexandria

IN THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO "RESPONSE OF THE DEFENDANT 12700K TO CROWN’S SUBMISSION ON JURISDICTION AND EVIDENTIARY ADMISSIBILITY" Your Honor, The Defendant’s persistent confusion between the distinct legal principles of jurisdiction and evidentiary...

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO "ENTREATY FOR DISMISS" Your Honor, Counsel for Defendant 12700k has confused criminal jurisdiction with evidentiary standards. They have asserted, incorrectly, that this criminal matter falls outside Alexandria's jurisdiction...

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY OF PROMPTING Your Honor, The Crown respectfully seeks clarification as to whether the Court in fact anticipates the filing of the Crown’s opening statement tomorrow in accordance with (#41), given that such a requirement at this...

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS RESPONSE TO OBJECTION - NOT RESPONSIVE (QUESTION 1) This is question is better suited for cross examination. As a proffer, these two were not government informants at the time the government began their investigation...

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY TO NOLLE PROSEQUI Your Honor, The Ministry of Justice has sided against continuing prosecution against the Defendant, as further pursuit of this charge serves neither justice nor the public interest. Citizens should not be made to...

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL Your Honor, The evidence referenced was included within discovery. The additional investigation referenced was P-003-1 and P-003-3. As your honor can see, the investigation was mostly irrelevant and just...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA CLOSING STATEMENT Stoned Enterprise Corp Applicant/Plaintiff v. Ministry of Development Respondent/Defendant Your Honor, I. REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION The Applicant seeks an advisory opinion which is in violation of the principle of...

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY TO AMEND SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY Your Honor, Throughout the course of this discovery and the Crown's parallel investigation, new evidence has emerged that we find necessitates an amendment to the initial criminal action filing to...

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY FOR CONTINUANCE The Ministry of Justice does not presently have counsel that it can assign to this case which it can guarantee will still represent the Ministry following this upcoming election. Prematurely assigning counsel at this time...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA CLOSING STATEMENT Lux Group Applicant/Plaintiff v. Ministry of Development Respondent/Defendant Your Honor, I. REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION The Applicant seeks an advisory opinion which is in violation of the principle of justiciability...

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA APPEAL Your Honor, The Crown respectfully submits this appeal on two distinct grounds, both arising from a major procedural error in the Chancery's otherwise thoughtful verdict. While the Crown commends the Chancery's impartial and...

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL Your Honor, The Crown respectfully submits that this Entreaty for Dismissal rests upon the same meritless foundations as those previously filed and repeatedly rebutted by the Crown. This motion warrants...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA OPENING STATEMENT Stoned Enterprise Corp Applicant/Plaintiff v. Ministry of Development Respondent/Defendant I. NO ULTRA VIRES ACTION OR COGNIZABLE INJURY The Ministry's regulations impose limits on what the Ministry can do, not what it...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA OPENING STATEMENT Lux Group Applicant/Plaintiff v. Ministry of Development Respondent/Defendant I. NO ULTRA VIRES ACTION OR COGNIZABLE INJURY The Ministry's regulations impose limits on what the Ministry can do, not what it may say in its...