Search results

In a 2-0 vote, the Chancery denies this appeal. The underlying law no longer is in force, and there is no basis for a claim to appeal.

The Crown (@SoggehToast) shall have seventy-two hours to file their closing statement.

In a 2-0 vote, the Chancery implements Rule 1 to this case. High Chancellor Smallfries is assigned as presiding officer.

Discovery is now over. Given the extended time that has elapsed since any movement from this proceeding, in a 2-0 vote the Chancery has decided to deny all outstanding motions. Parties are free to re-file any motion without penalty or scorn. Discovery submission P-009 is invalid, as it was...

I'm sorry, but as a private citizen suing in a private matter, you do not have standing to ask for clarification on this subject. It is a matter wholly unrelated to you and your issues here.

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO WRIT Defendant here asks the Chancery to recuse Magistrate Gribble19 for "bias and past encounters." The Defendant has provided no evidence of such bias or record of such encounters. I have absolutely no evidence, record, or justification...

This is granted.

This case has no presiding officer, and none can be assigned as only one seat is filled in the Chancery. No answer can be given to this request. If Parliament appoints a second uninterested Chancellor, or gives me authority to either rule on my own or promulgate new rules as I see fit, this case...

This objection is sustained in part. The Crown is clearly late in their response, and did not ask for an extension. While the Court understands very clearly the manpower issues and is sympathetic, it is necessary to hold the Crown in contempt, and fine them £100. However, it would be ridiculous...

Please explain what exactly this is.

The Crown shall have seventy-two hours to submit its closing statement.

This is denied. The Chancery will look into future methods of structuring witness questioning in the hopes of preventing these drawn out periods in the future. This is granted in part. All dialogue after the second question will be struck from the record. The courts are not a place to campaign...

@Thritystone

This objection is sustained. Whether an issue or fact is material is ultimately a conclusion for the trier of fact to make. The Crown may rephrase this question into one that asks about the technical or mathematical implications of a decision, but not one that delves into speculation or asks for...

This is granted.

In the interest of fairness, the Crown shall have one round of follow-up questions should they so choose. After that (or if the Crown relieves themselves of this right) we shall proceed into closing statements.

The possibility of having the entirety of the Magistrate Court fill in as one collective vote that could break a tie (or in this case, a failure to meet quorum) was discussed at the formation of the courts, but was abandoned due to concerns of constitutionality. Out of all the resolutions...

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA NOTICE OF PROCEDURAL POSTURE This case was filed prior to the promulgation of Ch. R. & P. § 1, which allows the Chancery to delegate one member of the bench to serve as presiding officer during the trial's existence. Because of this, the rule was...

This is sustained. The question contains modifiers such that if the witness were to simply answer "Yes," the record would be unclear as to what he meant. The Crown is ordered to revise this question.

This objection is overruled. Nowhere in any authorizing statute, rule, or binding precedent exists any statement requiring objections to be filed within the timeframe of the associated filing. For the same reason that parties must be allowed to raise their objections after the filing of the...