Search results

Granted. @Talion77 is ordered to present to this Tribunal any document or agreement memorializing a payment of £2,000 for work performed in this controversy on or before the filing date of this action.

We find for the Claimant and grant all requested relief. Member of Parliament @Kaiser_Bismarck is to be removed from their position immediately, and @SoggehToast put in their place. This is the judgment of the Chancery, and serves only as a statement of the immediate derived effects of this...

At its pleasure, the Chancery will note that it is finalizing its verdict in this matter and hopes to publish soon.

I'll grant this request on the assumption that Claimant has no qualms with it, and give the customary seventy-two hours for discovery. If Claimant does indeed have an issue, they may feel free to raise it. (@Talion77) Sidenote: Please try to be more timely, counsellor. I was going to move on...

Does the Crown (@ConsequencesInc) have any issue with this?

After conference, the Chancery grants a post-hoc nine hour stay, putting this appearance within the time allotted. As a result, we deny the entreaty for default judgment. We will now proceed with the trial in a timely fashion. The Crown shall have forty-eight hours to give their answer...

The Crown is commanded to appear before the Chancery in the case of Alliance 25 / The Greens for Alexandria v. Crown of Alexandria, Case VII (2026). Failure to appear within 72 hours may result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case. All parties will make themselves aware of...

The Chancery denies this entreaty. Yes, the courts can take time. A lot of time, at moments. This is an unfortunate truth. However, our work does not have deadlines. We are open and fair with deadlines we give, and for fairness's sake uphold them. Deadlines exist for a reason. If we just...

We strike Claimant's brief given its tardiness, noting the extended period in which we granted for it to be filed. We note that of course real-life happens, and other obligations arise. That is why we are not charging Claimant with contempt or otherwise punishing them. However, deadlines do...

Granted, from the time of the original deadline. This will be the only extension.

Very well, then. The Chancery grants summary judgment in this matter. As is tradition, both sides shall have an opportunity to produce a singular argumentative brief, within seventy-two hours.

Chancellor Chips writes the unanimous opinion of the Court. Claimant .FreakyyyyBob158 (“Claimant”) files suit against the Crown in the Chancery for relief on a matter of electorate qualification. The Crown failed to respond to summons, and Claimant submitted an Entreaty for Default Judgment to...

The unanimous opinion of the Chancery, written by Chancellor Chips Can a party truly be a party when it isn’t the biggest one around? That is the question for the Chancery today. Claimant IGNITE (“Claimant”), a political party, filed suit in proper jurisdiction to raise a constitutional issue...

As per the court rules, any fact that is neither affirmed nor denied is instead not contested. Do you consent to summary judgment under this information?

Discovery has concluded. Claimant (@Dartanboy) shall have seventy-two hours to produce their opening statement.

Denied as moot.

We deny what we believe to be both of the entreaties requested. A reconsideration appears to be requested, but is not elaborated on. A fresh dismissal writ is requested, but with very sparse elaboration, only giving two sentences each. The elaboration is not satisfactory and cites no authority...

Granted.

Granted. Case in recess pending verdict.

Granted, forty-eight hours from original deadine.