Search results

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA RULING ON THE ENTREATY TO COMPEL (AND INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE) BY THE DEFENDANTS The Court has reviewed the Entreaty and found four parts to it, namely: - The Defendants requesting pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO to produce a record of their Stratton-related...

Thank you for the reminder, the Court must've overlooked the Entreaty and will rule on it (as well as the Defendant's recent Entreaty to Dismiss) shortly.

Alright, thank you to both parties for confirming.

Given it has been more than 72 hours since an update by the Defendant on a potential settlement, the Court would like the parties to produce a settlement on this specific case, or a statement of assurance by the Claimant that a settlement is being finalised and will be posted within a reasonable...

Given that the Prosecution has produced the required material and a specific set of them are currently up for an in camera review by the Court, the Court grants the Entreaty of Continuance and therefore extends Discovery to 3rd July 2025, 4.00pm UTC.

The Court acknowledges the evidence submitted by the Defendant.

Given the rulings set out earlier in this case and in PhilinDeBlanc v. The Crown for the amendment of Discovery based on extensions to an Entreaty to Compel, the Court grants the Defendant's Entreaty of Continuance. Discovery shall end on the 2nd of July 2025, 6.40pm UTC.

Noted, thank you.

Username: Pepecuu Registered Name: Overseas-Commerce Banking Corporation Company Docket Thread URL: Company Docket: Overseas-Commerce Banking Corporation Address: C-2-Lancaster-St Primary Contact Person: Pepecuu (CEO and Director) Discord: @Pepecuu, Forums: Pepecuu, IGN: Pepecuu Directors...

The Court would like to remind the Prosecution (@Ibney0) to remove 12700k from all filings regarding this case, as he is no longer charged as per the agreement between the Prosecution and the Defendant.

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RULING ON ENTREATY OF CONSIDERATION BY THE DEFENDANTS Given the lack of evidence or change in circumstances in relation to their work and employment with Stratton LLC, the Court still has justifiable concerns over the transference of assets...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RULING ON ENTREATY TO COMPEL Given the lack of an objection by the Prosecution, the Court grants this Entreaty, with the Prosecution given 48 (FORTY-EIGHT) hours (Deadline: 29th June, 7.20pm UTC) to produce any relevant materials as...

Quick amendment, the bylaws inserted are wrong, attached are the correct bylaws, sorry about that.

Type of Legal Entity Being Formed: Corporation Proposed Registered Name of Entity: Overseas-Commerce Banking Corporation In-Game Company Name: OCBC In-Game Name(s) of Incorporator(s)/Formator(s): Pepecuu For Corporations and SPEs: Please attach your signed Certificate of...

The Court acknowledges the evidence submitted by the Defendant's counsel.

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY OF STRIKING The Defendants submit this Entreaty of Striking to request to strike portions of the case filing listed below. 1. Request to Strike Fact 6 The "fact" submitted by the Claimant is irrelevant to this case, as it does not address or add...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA OBJECTION - PERJURY The Claimant has stated that "Even members of the magistrate Where agreaing which puts a deeper cut to the actaul corruption of the courts." in Fact number 3. This is evidently false as there are no evidence by the Claimant to state...

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA ANSWER TO COMPLAINT snow_crp Claimant v. cixudy (Represented by Pepecuu) Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defendant DENIES this fact, as the Defendant made a sweeping claim based on their personal opinion of the entire Alexandrian police force...

Your honor, I would like to notify the Court that I am now representing cixudy as their legal counsel. The proof of retainer is attached below.

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA ANSWER TO COMPLAINT snow_crp Claimant v. Pepecuu Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defendant NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES this fact, as it is not applicable to this Defendant specifically. 2. The Defendant NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES this "fact", as...