Lawsuit: Pending Ayatha v. The Crown (2; electric boogaloo)

[Aya]

Ayatha
V.
the Crown​

1. Jurisdiction
As a constitutional case pertaining to the powers of parliament as enshrined by the constitution, this case lay within the chancery's jurisdiction.

2. Parties
Applicants,
Ayatha, as an Independent Candidate for the Alexandrian Parliament

Respondents,
The Crown,
The 3rd Parliament of the Sovereign Kingdom of Alexandria

3. Facts
1. The constitution is a document that outlines the rights of both the citizens, and all organs of the Alexandrian government with explicit guidelines for what the organs of the government are allowed to do; with the presumption that the organizations of which derive their legitimacy from the document require passing a constitutional amendment (which is also outlined within the constitution) to change or add new capabilities that are not derived from it exactly.
2. The specific portion of the constitution in question (Part 1, Section 3, Point 7) explicitly reads: "Power to Impeach: Parliament has the authority to remove Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Officers for misconduct."
3. Legislative Officers have been defined out of existence according to the SpeakR-Act, and as such there are currently no Legislative Officers within Alexandria as there are none outlined.
4. Ayatha at no point was a member of the Cabinet, or the Judiciary, and thus at no point held the position of being a Judicial or Executive Officer
5. Ayatha was unlawfully removed from their position as MP utilising an illegal Motion to Remove passed by parliament when parliament does not have the right to remove MP's

4. Claims for Relief
1. An immediate recognition by the courts that Motions to Remove in their current form are illegal.
2. An immediate reinstatement of Ayatha's rightfully earned political office following their appointment by a near unanimous vote within Parliament.
3. The voiding of the Motion to Remove as it is recognised as illegal.

Prayer for Relief
I hope the Chancery will see the failings as clearly as Ameslap and everyone in the Politics channel does as this is a clearly illegal action underneath the constitution. If Parliament wishes to grant itself the capability to remove MPs, they should rightfully have it enshrined into the constitution as it is a very important thing to keep in mind for all individuals seeking public office, and there is no information that such a thing is even possible in any laws or the constitution itself; and parliament is drawing its authority from what seems to be nothing to do such.

 

[Aya]

Entreaty for Default Judgement
As I seek to expedite this as much as possible to save both my and the courts time, I will be motioning for a writ of default judgement as I am very clearly in the right, and I see literally no way for the Crown to disprove an argument so ironclad the Queen agrees to it. This is an open and shut case.