- Joined
- Apr 29, 2025
- Messages
- 70
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
ToadKing
Defendants
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
ToadKing engaged in several acts of new player fraud and foreign exchanges fraud over the past week. Under the guise of promises that the current government would engage in debt relief to new players, he received at least £24,600 in monetary funds, £20,000 of which were from placing these new players into £5,000 debts.
I. PARTIES -
The Crown (Prosecution)
ToadKing (Defendant)
II. FACTS -
1. ToadKing engaged in a trade of SC£6200 for DC$100,000 on June 19, 2025. Exhibit P-001; Exhibit P-002
2. This exchange represents a trade of SC£1 for every DC$16.
3. To effectuate this trade, ToadKing told the player that a debt relief bill would be coming to Parliament that would result in his debts being forgiven. Exhibit P-003-1 through P-003-4; Exhibit P-004-1 through P-004-5.
4. On June 20, 2025, ToadKing traded with two additional players in a style very similar to the previous trade. Exhibit P-005-1 thorugh P-005-3; P-006-1 through {P-006-2.
5. On June 20, 2025, ToadKing traded with a third player in a style very similar to the previous trade, however, exchanged the funds for a reasonably equitable exchange at £6,000 for $250,000. Nevertheless, he still used the lie of debt relief to obtain the trade, and based it off their status as a new player to Alexandria.
5. These trades resulted in a gain of £24,600.
III. Argument -
1. DC$100,000 constitutes a price for SC£6200 far below the market rate. This rate was achieved through deception via the lying about the bill in question, constituting foreign exchanges fraud.
2. Even if the exchange can be seen as equitable, obtaining the exchange through lying about a bill to relieve debts constitutes new player fraud.
3. This act additionally constituted New Player Fraud, as the defendant targeted players new to Alexandria to effectuate their scheme.
IV. CHARGES -
Counts 1 - CCPA Sec. 21 (3)(i) - New Player Fraud
Count 2 - CCPA Sec. 21 (3)(i) - New Player Fraud
Count 3 - CCPA Sec. 21 (3)(i) - New Player Fraud
Count 4 - CCPA Sec. 21 (3)(i) - New Player Fraud
Counts 5 - CCPA Sec. 20 (6)(e) - Foreign Exchanges Fraud
Count 6 - CCPA Sec. 20 (6)(e) - Foreign Exchanges Fraud
Count 7 - CCPA Sec. 20 (6)(e) - Foreign Exchanges Fraud
V. Witnesses -
1. Pepecuu
2. JustLegendMilk
3. Boozle
ENTREATIES TO FREEZE AND SEIZE ASSETS INVOLVED IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE FRAUD
Based on my knowledge and experience, those accused of Foreign Exchange Fraud often move and disperse money within their account to other location. As such, we request the assets alleged stolen within this case be frozen pending the final conclusion. This would total £24,600. P-008-1 represents the defendants assets at the time this action was submitted, and any major changes in assets to prevent this movement should be construed as an attempt to protect assets from criminal liability.
