OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 12700K
My client, 12700K, hereby formally enters a plea of NOT GUILTY to each and every charge enumerated in the indictment, specifically:
a. Conspiracy to violate CCPA Sec. 21(3)(b);
b. One count of violating CCPA Sec. 21(3)(b) - Bribery;
c.Conspiracy to violate CCPA Sec. 20(6)(d) - Election Fraud;
d.Attempt to violate CCPA Sec. 20(6)(d) - Election Fraud.
MEMORANDUM OF DEFENSE FOR THE ACCUSED, 12700K
The defense respectfully submits the following grounds for the dismissal of all four (4) charges, based on fundamental deficiencies in the prosecution’s case.
I. FAILURE TO MEET THE BURDEN OF PROOF & INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Pursuant to the Rules of Evidence Act and legal framework omnibus Act, the prosecution bears the affirmative burden of proving each element of the alleged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. The proffered evidence—specifically Exhibits P-013, P-014, P-015, and P-016 is manifestly insufficient to sustain this burden, particularly concerning the essential elements of bribery and election fraud.
Critical Absence of a Quid Pro Quo (Money Transfer) Nexus: The core of a bribery charge under CCPA Sec. 21(3)(b) requires evidence of a corrupt exchange. The prosecution’s exhibits are wholly devoid of any documentation, record, or credible testimony demonstrating a financial transaction or transfer of valuables from the accused to any voter or election official. No “quid pro quo”(Money Transfer) has been established, thereby vitiating the very foundation of the bribery and related conspiracy charges.
II. IMPERMISSIBLE AND EXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL EVIDENCE
The defense objects to the admission of evidence sourced from outside the jurisdiction of this Court, as its consideration constitutes a reversible error.
Violation of the Rules of Evidence Act: As stipulated in Section EVO-1(support evidence attached) of the aforementioned Act, evidence submitted in proceedings before this Magistrate Court must be solely drawn from StateCraft (Alexandria). This is not a mere procedural formality but a jurisdictional prerequisite ensuring the integrity and applicability of evidence. Any material originating from DemocracyCraft (Redmont) is, by statutory definition, inadmissible as it falls outside the competent jurisdiction of this tribunal. To rely on such extrinsic evidence would be prejudicial and contrary to established legal procedure as established by The Rules of Evidence ACT , Civil Procedure ACT and the Judiciary ACT.
CONCLUSION
Based on the insufficiency of evidence to meet the statutory burden of proof and the improper submission of extra-jurisdictional evidence, the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against 12700K. The charges are legally unsupported and must be dismissed in the interests of justice.
Respectfully submitted,
SrICEKING
Legal Representative for 12700K
Reference
VOTE: 7-0-0
A
BILL
TO
Establish Rules of Evidence
In the Kingdom of Alexandria
1 - Short Title and Enactment
(1) This Act may be cited as the 'Rules of Evidence Act'
(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage. The passage of this act shall in no way affect cases currently in proceedings.
(3) This Act has been authored by Ibney0.
(4) This Act has been sponsored by Dartanboy
2 - Reasons and Scope
(1) The Court requires a rulebook for adjudicating evidentiary disputes.
(2) This act shall apply to all cases where a Court examines a case under their original...
PARLIAMENT VOTING: 7-0-0
A
BILL
TO
Amend Several Laws within Alexandrian Law to Promote Productivity, Increase Effectiveness, and Ensure Workability
1 - Short Title and Enactment
(1) This Act may be cited as the 'Legal Framework Omnibus Amendments Act'
(2) This Act shall be enacted immediately upon its signage. The passage of this act shall in no way affect cases currently in proceedings.
(3) This Act has been authored by Ibney0. This act has been cosponsored by Ameslap.
2 - Reasons and Legislative Findings
(1) After some just and testing, some laws within Alexandria...
