Lawsuit: In Session McBrittle419 v. Crown, Case 7 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

[Dogeington]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Writ to Compel

The Magistrates Court of Alexandria shall grant in part the defendant's Entreaty to Compel.

The Crown must provide:​

1. Internal MoJ documents and/or guidelines for Police Officers that outlines what standard of proof is to be used for Summary Offense arrests.​
2. Internal MoJ documents and/or guidelines for Police Officers regarding Wanted Stars and how to interpret them.​
3. Internal MoJ documents and/or guidelines for Employees regarding investigations around Wanted Stars.​

The Crown must produce, or otherwise inform the court of the inexistence of, this evidence within 48 hours.

So ordered,
Magistrate Dogeington
@Capt11543 @ConsequencesInc ​

 

[Dogeington]

IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA

Your honour,

As the sole private, licensed healthcare provider in Alexandria, I would like to file an amicus brief on the use of prescription psychoactive medications by constables on duty as a way to treat neurological disorders as it relates to this case.

Signed,
Dr. Phillin D. Blanc, M.D.

This request is denied.
Mr. PhillinDeBlanc, you are a witness in this case, and should this information be relevant to the trial at hand, I am sure that your testimony shall be crucial when it is used by the Crown.

 

[Dogeington]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY FOR CONTINUANCE



Your Honor,

The Crown hereby requests that the Discovery deadline be tolled pending the resolution of this Entreaty to Compel.

We are reserving the right to file a complete response at a later time.

Respectfully submitted,
Capt11543
Crown Counsel

Granted
The discovery deadline is tolled pending the resolution of the writ to compel or any subsequent motions to reconsider.

 

[ConsequencesInc]

IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No. 6
ENTREATY TO RECONSIDER

Granted in part
Request 4 regarding PhillinDeBlanc's conduct is not directly relevant to this case. While the documents yielded by the MOJ and the future testimony of PhillinDeBlanc will shed light on his conduct, this is not a criminal or civil hearing into PhillinDeBlanc's conduct, and I see no need to make such personal information public.

Your Honor,

While I agree that PhillinDeBlanc's general conduct and personal information is not needed to be made public, what the Defense is requesting is specifically records regarding PhillinDeBlanc's conduct as a representative of the MoJ in his capacity as a police officer. Normally character evidence of this kind is not allowed in trials, however I believe this merits the exception laid out in the Court Rules regarding Pattern of Behavior. See General Court Rules and Procedures (JuniperFig, 2025). §8 of The New Hamilton Police Department Code of Conduct notes than any mistakes, negligence or violations of the Code of Conduct will result in disciplinary action that is recorded, and those might establish a pattern of behavior.

The Defense would be willing to compromise to limit the scope of the records to only those regarding complaints or investigations around arrests that resulted in disciplinary action against PhillinDeBlanc that are not already in evidence. These records would be of importance to proving the Defense's assertion that the arresting officer is not the most well behaved officer and has a propensity for deviating from the rules.

If these records do not exist they would only strengthen the Crown's case in that regard as they can claim the arresting officer has not history of misconduct. However if these records do exist and they show this pattern of behavior, they are more prejudicial to the Defendant's case if they are not on the record than if they were.

This is all I will have to say on this matter and will not argue it any further in this court.


Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
5/10/2026

 

[Dogeington]

IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No. 6
ENTREATY TO RECONSIDER




Your Honor,

While I agree that PhillinDeBlanc's general conduct and personal information is not needed to be made public, what the Defense is requesting is specifically records regarding PhillinDeBlanc's conduct as a representative of the MoJ in his capacity as a police officer. Normally character evidence of this kind is not allowed in trials, however I believe this merits the exception laid out in the Court Rules regarding Pattern of Behavior. See General Court Rules and Procedures (JuniperFig, 2025). §8 of The New Hamilton Police Department Code of Conduct notes than any mistakes, negligence or violations of the Code of Conduct will result in disciplinary action that is recorded, and those might establish a pattern of behavior.

The Defense would be willing to compromise to limit the scope of the records to only those regarding complaints or investigations around arrests that resulted in disciplinary action against PhillinDeBlanc that are not already in evidence. These records would be of importance to proving the Defense's assertion that the arresting officer is not the most well behaved officer and has a propensity for deviating from the rules.

If these records do not exist they would only strengthen the Crown's case in that regard as they can claim the arresting officer has not history of misconduct. However if these records do exist and they show this pattern of behavior, they are more prejudicial to the Defendant's case if they are not on the record than if they were.

This is all I will have to say on this matter and will not argue it any further in this court.


Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
5/10/2026

I am willing to grant this on the condition that the evidence is released in a closed court session.
@Capt11543 Should the crown object to this, please inform the court within 24 hours.

 

[ConsequencesInc]

IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No. 6
SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE

Your Honor,

The Defense is submitting into evidence D-004: A screenshot of chat logs from the day of the event, where the victim Thritystone offered to settle and claim the death that occurred was consensual for £100 from the Defendant.


Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
5/11/2026