Just to clarify to all parties, I (Pepecuu) will be recusing myself from this lawsuit, given a clear Conflict of Interest as I am one of the Plaintiffs for this case.
After a review by the Court on P-013, the Court has overlooked the fact that the mention of "victim" only appears outside of the evidence itself, and therefore no changes would be needed on the Prosecution's end as they have already followed the Court order.
Additionally, as the Defendant also...
Given the Prosecution's submission of their opening statements, the Defendants now have 72 hours (Deadline: 30th August 2025, 3.15am UTC) to file their opening statement.
After a review by the Court, the Court would like to clarify that the striking is intended towards P-013 as evidence against the Defendants. The Prosecution is within their rights to file an entreaty of reconsideration should it believe it has arguments that can overturn this ruling.
Given that it has been more than 72 hours since either party has made any amendments, Discovery has now ended and the Court will now move into opening statements. The Prosecution shall have 72 hours to make their opening statement (Deadline: 26th August 2025, 5.00am UTC).
The Court would like to notify the Defendant that the link is inaccessible due to permissions, please allow it to be viewable via the link, thanks!
However, given the .zip file for D-019 is accessible, the Court shall consider the evidence presented and continue with normal Court proceedings...
I have been informed by Staff that the Defendant's Counsel have the information that was requested, therefore I would like to request that the counsel provide this information to the Court as soon as they reasonably can or within 48 hours.
Given that all outstanding Entreaties and Objections have been ruled upon (to the Court's knowledge), Discovery is once again open for the next 72 hours (Deadline: 12th August 2025, 1.13pm UTC).
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Ruling on Writ to Subpoena by the Defendant
The Defendant submitted a Writ to Subpoena a Moderator/Staff (#87) "for server entry/exit logs as well as money transfer logs for Defendant Mr_GrapeJelly." Given there are no stipulations that forbid or set...
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Ruling on Entreaty to Reconsider by the Defendant
After a review of the Defendant's Entreaty for Reconsideration (#108) and the Prosecution's response (#111), the Court notes that under §4 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act, "The Magistrate Court must...
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Ruling on Objections made by the Defendant
Objection overruled. The Court concurs with the Prosecution and believes that relevance is a low threshold, as under the Rules of Evidence Act, it makes any fact in issue “more or less probable.” The Crown’s...
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO NOLLE PROSEQUI
Your Honor,
The Claimant would like to Nolle Prosequi because the current Alexandrian Parliament are close to the end of their term, therefore likely invalidating any effect of a Court Ruling or Verdict. The Claimant humbly...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.