Search results

  1. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    @Thritystone here are the new questions as well as the ones that were still allowed by the court: 1. During your time as Minister of Internal Affairs, did you observe any connection between a player’s amount of playtime and their effectiveness in legislative duties? 2. In your personal...
  2. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE This is more of a statement I suppose, I understand that there was no deadline to submit my re-phrased work. I wanted to let the court know that I will be unable to do so until Monday afternoon (MST) at the earliest. Attempting to take Sunday as a day with family...
  3. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Responses: Actually, your honour, this is not true. To be the Minister of Internal Affairs, Thritystone was required to be a member of Parliament as well. If they had direct experence as a legislator they can speak to the evidence of legislator competency. Additionally, the MoIA office is...
  4. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Sorry your honour, for whatever reason the quote tool did not actually quote all of the objections that should have been in my Breach of Procedure Objection.
  5. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEEDURE On all of these objections, The Crown waited until long after the 24 hour period passed to raise these objections, especially for the intial questions. Furthermore, they admit that they knew that they were past the deadline online. Proof: I will be going...
  6. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Your honour, I plan on responding to these objections, I am just not in a place that I can at the moment. I would ask that the court continue to allow the witness to respond to questions while these objections are being ruled on.
  7. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Follow up questions: 1. You stated that the Ministry did not conduct a comprehensive study on whether playtime leads to better legislators. Why did the Ministry choose 4 hours in the past 30 days as the requirement? 2. Are you aware of how Parliament came to the 4 hour figure? 3. You wrote...
  8. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Minister @Thritystone, thank you so much for being with us here today. Here are some of the questions I shall pose now, and I may have follow-up questions. 1. What evidence, if any, shows that higher playtime leads to better or more effective legislators? 2. Is it true that a citizen can...
  9. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Response Your honor, if I may be allowed a response to this. If not, please strike. While the Plaintiff does not outright disagree with the inclusion, I do object to its relevance. The central question at stake is whether my removal as a candidate was unconstitutional, and the questions asked...
  10. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    IN THE HONOURABLE CHANCERY Opening Statement May it please the Court. By placing restrictions on a citizen’s right to run for and hold public office, the Kingdom of Alexandria has violated its own Constitution. In doing so, it has not only harmed the rule of law but it has harmed me directly...
  11. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    IN THE HIGH CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY FOR PROMPTING Your honour, this may not be the proper entreaty, but it is the one that makes the most sense. If there is a better one, please let me know. Per the Chancery Rules updated 9/10, the Plaintiff would like to know how the...
  12. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    IN THE CHANCERY OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY OF PROMPTING Your honour, I request that the opening statement have a deadline of 72 hours after the ruling on the Entreaty of Reconsideration. This will impact the opening statements.
  13. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY FOR RECONSIDERATION Your honours, I ask that you reconsider the consequences of this decision to deny my witnesses outright. The Plaintiff believes these witnesses are crucial in determining the only fact in question: If, for whatever...
  14. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    I would ask if they are not allowed to be direct witnesses then the Plaintiff be allowed to submit testimony as evidence for these individuals if they choose to give it.
  15. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    Ibney0 is a legal expert, lawmaker, and helped with the 2025 Election Results and can speak on the letter of the law. Thritystone was the Minister of Internal Affairs and will be asked on their discussion and implementation of the election law. As a Framer of the Constitution, CasualGreyKnight...
  16. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    The Applicant rescinds this request, I was able to submit everything in a timely fashion and no longer require it. Thank you.
  17. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    The Plaintiff calls Former Prime Minister and Framer of the Alexandria Constitution Casualgreyknight as a witness as well.
  18. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    The Plaintiff requests an additional 48 hours to Discovery, we have a couple of outstanding items that we intend to produce.
  19. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Ameslap v. Crown, Case 12 (Ch. 2025)

    The Plaintiff calls the following individuals as witnesses: 1. ibney0 2. Thritystone
Back
Top