Search results

ENTREATY OF STRIKING - NARRATIVE AND NON RESPONSIVE This is another instance of the witness going beyond the scope of the question and instead commenting on the type of people who are becoming citizens and the supposed values of our nation. I again ask that this response be struck.

ENTREATY OF STRIKING - NARRATIVE AND NON RESPONSIVE The question asked for the witness’s observations about Members of Parliament’s playtime and their ability to perform their duties. Instead, the witness gives a long philosophical speech — talking about Alexandria “existing in Minecraft,”...

ENTREATY TO COMPEL Your honor, I request that the Witness have sanctions held against them as it has been over 5 days since the question was posed, and over 3 days since you last pinged them. The Court Rules give the general standard 'flow' if a case as: This has gone on for far to long, I...

IN THE CHANCERY OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY OF STRIKING Apologies, I didn't realize that I didn't have any more follow-up questions to ask. I request that they be struck from the record. My objections still stand.

Q2 Objection - Calls for Speculation The witness can't credibly assess how the outcome would have changed. Q3 Objection - Leading and Calls for Speculation It presupposes that more playtime is equal to "practical knowledge". Also it assumes that the witness can compare themselves to other...

1. Objection - Compound Question The question improperly combines three distinct inquiries (objective, verifiable, uniform) into one, each deserves its own inquiry.

@Thritystone here are the new questions as well as the ones that were still allowed by the court: 1. During your time as Minister of Internal Affairs, did you observe any connection between a player’s amount of playtime and their effectiveness in legislative duties? 2. In your personal...

ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE This is more of a statement I suppose, I understand that there was no deadline to submit my re-phrased work. I wanted to let the court know that I will be unable to do so until Monday afternoon (MST) at the earliest. Attempting to take Sunday as a day with family...

We consent.

Responses: Actually, your honour, this is not true. To be the Minister of Internal Affairs, Thritystone was required to be a member of Parliament as well. If they had direct experence as a legislator they can speak to the evidence of legislator competency. Additionally, the MoIA office is...

Sorry your honour, for whatever reason the quote tool did not actually quote all of the objections that should have been in my Breach of Procedure Objection.

OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEEDURE On all of these objections, The Crown waited until long after the 24 hour period passed to raise these objections, especially for the intial questions. Furthermore, they admit that they knew that they were past the deadline online. Proof: I will be going...

Your honour, I plan on responding to these objections, I am just not in a place that I can at the moment. I would ask that the court continue to allow the witness to respond to questions while these objections are being ruled on.

Follow up questions: 1. You stated that the Ministry did not conduct a comprehensive study on whether playtime leads to better legislators. Why did the Ministry choose 4 hours in the past 30 days as the requirement? 2. Are you aware of how Parliament came to the 4 hour figure? 3. You wrote...

Minister @Thritystone, thank you so much for being with us here today. Here are some of the questions I shall pose now, and I may have follow-up questions. 1. What evidence, if any, shows that higher playtime leads to better or more effective legislators? 2. Is it true that a citizen can...

Response Your honor, if I may be allowed a response to this. If not, please strike. While the Plaintiff does not outright disagree with the inclusion, I do object to its relevance. The central question at stake is whether my removal as a candidate was unconstitutional, and the questions asked...

IN THE HONOURABLE CHANCERY Opening Statement May it please the Court. By placing restrictions on a citizen’s right to run for and hold public office, the Kingdom of Alexandria has violated its own Constitution. In doing so, it has not only harmed the rule of law but it has harmed me directly...

IN THE HIGH CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY FOR PROMPTING Your honour, this may not be the proper entreaty, but it is the one that makes the most sense. If there is a better one, please let me know. Per the Chancery Rules updated 9/10, the Plaintiff would like to know how the...

IN THE CHANCERY OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY OF PROMPTING Your honour, I request that the opening statement have a deadline of 72 hours after the ruling on the Entreaty of Reconsideration. This will impact the opening statements.

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA ENTREATY FOR RECONSIDERATION Your honours, I ask that you reconsider the consequences of this decision to deny my witnesses outright. The Plaintiff believes these witnesses are crucial in determining the only fact in question: If, for whatever...