Search results

  1. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    @ConsequencesInc Have you finished cross examination?
  2. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    @SoggehToast You have 48 hours to respond.
  3. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    This entreaty is denied. It is unclear if the judiciary, let alone the Magistrates Court, has the authority to grant a witness immunity. Prosecutorial discretion is given to the MOJ. The best the court could do is ask the MOJ, to which they could say no, after which the court would have no...
  4. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    This entreaty is denied in its entirety. Writs of striking are specifically pertaining either to objectionable content or frivolous/scandalous portions of a pleading, claim, or defence. The legal concept of "non-responsive," born of Redmontian law, does not exist in the Kingdom of Alexandria...
  5. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    Objection Granted, 12 and 14 shall be struck in their entirety.
  6. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed McBrittle419 v. Crown, Case 7 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA WRIT OF DISMISSAL The Court hereby dismisses this case with prejudice. Restitution must be paid to the Defendant in the amount of £600 for the fine levied against her, plus 1 Penalty Unit for each minute spent in jail (£50 for 30 seconds)...
  7. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed McBrittle419 v. Crown, Case 7 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    Seeing as both parties are in agreement
  8. Dogeington

    Repealed Standing Orders of the 5th and 6th Parliament

    AMENDMENT 02 Should the associated motion to amend pass, the Standing Orders of Parliament shall be amended in the manner described below. The following subsections shall be added to section 3.6: (b) Acts of Parliament that exist solely to amend other Acts of Parliament shall be moved to the...
  9. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    @PhillinDeBlanc there are still questions pending
  10. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    @SoggehToast I have given a great deal of leway to the crown in this case, the 72 hours have elapsed. You have 24 hours to respond to the entreaty in #67
  11. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed McBrittle419 v. Crown, Case 7 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    This request is Granted, please file a response within the next 48 hours
  12. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed McBrittle419 v. Crown, Case 7 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA WRIT OF SUMMONS @PhillinDeBlanc is commanded to appear before the Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in Case 7 (Mag Ct., 2026) McBrittle419 Applicant/Defendant v. The Crown Respondent/Prosecution They are hereby required to...
  13. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed McBrittle419 v. Crown, Case 7 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    @Capt11543 We will now begin the prosecution's Case in Cheif. I will issue a summons for the witnesses on your list. You will have 24 hours to question them following their appearance in court.
  14. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    This court is in recess for 72 hours
  15. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ComplexKing v. Crown, Case 8 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    I believe an adjudication on my part would constitute a conflict of interest, so therefore I shall recuse myself from this case
  16. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    @Capt11543 @PhillinDeBlanc Another reminder to please answer the questions here in a timly manner
  17. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

    This objection is denied. This question is not framed as such asking for a legal conclusion, but rather for the opinion of the witness. The wording in the question is clear, "do you know for sure". This is asking a yes or no question of the witness's base of knowledge, not for them to make a...
Back
Top