Lawsuit: Dismissed A5wagyuK v. Ministry of Justice, Case 9 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

[Ibney0]

A5wagyuK
Petitioner

v.

Ministry of Justice
Respondent​

I. Jurisdictional Statement
This Court has jurisdiction over appeals for criminal misdemeanor offenses under Alex. Const. Part III, Sec. 16, as well as Sec. 3 Sub. Sec. 3 of the Alexandria Criminal Code ("ACC").

II. Factual Circumstances

1. On May 17, 2025, Extromondo and fearlessNacktmul engaged in a property dispute which eventually led to a fight.
2. A5wagyuK noticed there was a dispute, and made his way over to the property.
3. When he arrived, he saw Extromondo and fearlessNacktmul attacking and killing each other multiple times.
4. Extromondo was warned to leave the property, but did not leave.
5. When A5wagyuK noticed that Extromondo was on fearlessNacktmul property attacking him, he intervened to defend fearlessNacktmul.
6. All parties engaged in fighting for an extended 20 minutes, at which point fighting ceased.
7. On May 20, 2025, Snow_crp fined A5wagyuK $4200

III. Argument

1. A5WagyuK engaged in self-defense of another when he defended fearlessNacktmul from attacks by Extromondo. See ACC Sec. 4, Sub. Sec. 2.
2. At the time, it was reasonable for A5WagyuK to believe that fearlessNacktmul was in danger of death from the illegal and dangerous actions of Extromondo.
3. Additionally, A5WagyuK was protected by castle doctrine as Extromondo had been told to leave once previously. See ACC Sec. 3, Sub. Sec. 11.
4. The right to defend himself extended to A5WagyuK from fearlessNacktmul, as A5WagyuK fought on behalf of fearlessNacktmul.
5. Because A5WagyuK's actions were lawful on the 17th, this Court should under its appellate powers from the ACC reverse the summary decision of the Ministry of Justice Officer.

IV. Prayer for Relief
Therefore, petitioner requests this Court reverse the determination of the Ministry of Justice Officer, and return the $4200 fined from A5WagyuK. Additionally, the Ministry of Justice should be made to pay for the legal fees incurred from this appeal, which amount to $100.

Witness List:
A5WagyuK
Extromondo
fearlessNacktmul
Snow_crp

 

[Ibney0]

Exhibit B:

Exhibit C:

Proof of Representation:

 

[Gribble19]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
SUMMONS


The Ministry of Justice is commanded to appear before the Magistrates' Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in

Case 9 (Mag Ct., 2025)

A5wagyuK
Plaintiff
v.

Ministry of Justice
Defendant


The Defendant is hereby required, within seventy-two (72) hours, to file an Answer to Complaint.
Failure to file an Answer to Complaint may result in a default judgment.​

 

[Gribble19]

The Ministry of Justice has failed to file their Answer to Complaint within seventy-two hours as required. The Ministry of Justice is hereby charged with Contempt of Court and is fined £100. If the Defendant does not file their Answer to Complaint promptly, they may be charged with Contempt of Court again.

 

[Dartanboy]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

I. ANSWER

1. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY On May 17, 2025, Extromondo and fearlessNacktmul engaged in a property dispute which eventually led to a fight.
2. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY A5wagyuK noticed there was a dispute, and made his way over to the property.
3. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY When he arrived, he saw Extromondo and fearlessNacktmul attacking and killing each other multiple times.
4. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY Extromondo was warned to leave the property, but did not leave.
5. NEIRHER AFFIRM NOR DENY When A5wagyuK noticed that Extromondo was on fearlessNacktmul property attacking him, he intervened to defend fearlessNacktmul.
6. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY All parties engaged in fighting for an extended 20 minutes, at which point fighting ceased.
7. AFFIRM On May 20, 2025, Snow_crp fined A5wagyuK $4200

II. DEFENSES
The Plaintiff has not offered proof of self defense.

Furthermore, even if we assume all the facts are true, which we cannot do as the evidence just is not there, the facts desribe defense of another person, not bona-fide self-defense.

 

[Gribble19]

We will now enter Discovery for a period of 72 hours. Discovery may be extended or ended early through the methods prescribed by the court rules and procedures.

 

[Ibney0]

Your honor,

Plaintiff provides exhibit D below.

Additionally your honor, we ask for a pretrial ruling as to who bears the burden of proof in this case. plaintiff asserts as this is an appeal for a summary offense under Sec. 3 Sub. Sec. 3 of the Alexandria Criminal Code ("ACC"), plaintiff does not bear the burden of proof, but instead the defense. As my client was charged with a crime, and is bringing this action to compel the government to provide proof of their charge, plaintiff owes no burden to the defense.

Additionally, your honor, a criminal defendant need not prove anything in a self defense action. The burden of proof rests on the government to show the plaintiff did not act in self defense.

While the terms are misleading, it is plaintiffs position they are actually the defense in this case, and that this is a criminal action.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor,

Plaintiff provides exhibit D below.

Additionally your honor, we ask for a pretrial ruling as to who bears the burden of proof in this case. plaintiff asserts as this is an appeal for a summary offense under Sec. 3 Sub. Sec. 3 of the Alexandria Criminal Code ("ACC"), plaintiff does not bear the burden of proof, but instead the defense. As my client was charged with a crime, and is bringing this action to compel the government to provide proof of their charge, plaintiff owes no burden to the defense.

Additionally, your honor, a criminal defendant need not prove anything in a self defense action. The burden of proof rests on the government to show the plaintiff did not act in self defense.

While the terms are misleading, it is plaintiffs position they are actually the defense in this case, and that this is a criminal action.

Your honor, may we respond to the request?

 

[Gribble19]

Your honor,

Plaintiff provides exhibit D below.

Additionally your honor, we ask for a pretrial ruling as to who bears the burden of proof in this case. plaintiff asserts as this is an appeal for a summary offense under Sec. 3 Sub. Sec. 3 of the Alexandria Criminal Code ("ACC"), plaintiff does not bear the burden of proof, but instead the defense. As my client was charged with a crime, and is bringing this action to compel the government to provide proof of their charge, plaintiff owes no burden to the defense.

Additionally, your honor, a criminal defendant need not prove anything in a self defense action. The burden of proof rests on the government to show the plaintiff did not act in self defense.

While the terms are misleading, it is plaintiffs position they are actually the defense in this case, and that this is a criminal action.

In the future a request such as this should be made in the form of an entreaty. The court rules and procedures allow for entreaties to be made that are not explicitly listed when a party wishes to make a request for something outside of the listed options and that would have been appropriate in this situation.

For the sake of efficiency the Court will hereby clarify that this case will be treated as a civil case with regards to the burden of proof and standard of proof. The burden of proof therefore rests on the party that initiated these proceedings, which in this case is Petitioner A5wagyuK.

Your honor, may we respond to the request?

This is no longer necessary.
If either party wishes to make a formal request to the court they may do so in the form of an entreaty.

The period of Discovery is hereby extended until 24 hours after this post.

 

[Ibney0]

Your honor,

I am unable to continue litigation on behalf of my client, and so is the attorney for the respondent. Both attorneys who are the Minister of Justice and the Prime Minister respectively are currently working to iron out a pardon so that this case becomes moot, and I request an extension at this time.

 

[Gribble19]

The period of Discovery is hereby extended for a further 5 days.

 

[Ibney0]

Your honor,

As the King has pardoned the defendant, we request this case be dismissed.

 

[Gribble19]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the precedent set by Case 7 (Ch. 2025) #11, the Court hereby dismisses this case, as the Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue it.​