Lawsuit: Pending bernard_madoff v. Crown, Case 5 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

ConsequencesInc

Member
Finance Secretary
Member of Parliament
ConsequencesInc
ConsequencesInc
Finance Secretary
Joined
Apr 12, 2025
Messages
60
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION

Case No.:
5

BETWEEN:

bernard_madoff

Plaintiff

v.

THE CROWN OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Defendant


I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT AND VENUE

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this suit pursuant to §14 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria which vests judicial power in the courts to interpret and administer the law.

2. The Magistrate Court is the proper venue for this suit as §16 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria grants this court jurisdiction over all civil and criminal matters.


II. PARTIES

1. bernard_maddoff (also referred to as the "Plaintiff") is an individual seeking damages due to the immense emotional distress, illegal detainment, and grevious violation of his Constitutional rights.

2. The Crown of the Kingdom of Alexandria (also referred to as the "Defendant" or "the Crown"), as the employer of Minister of Justice Soggehtoast, whom was acting in his official government capacity as a particular individual and Peace Officer during this incident. Under §7 (1) of the New Hamilton Police Department Code of Conduct, employees acting on behalf of the Ministry may not be the subject of litigation. This means the Crown, representing the governmental interests of the Ministry of Justice, is the proper counterparty of this suit.


III. FACTS
(All times are in UTC-06)

1. At around 9pm on March 11th, 2026, bernard_madoff entered the plot of c-7-high-st owned by MrRoyaltys.
2. At 9:17pm, while bernard_madoff was enjoying his peaceful assembly time as a particular individual on the publicly accessible plot, Peace Officer and Minister of Justice SoggehToast began to unironically break the peace by systematically and repeatedly assaulting and murdering the Plaintiff bernard_madoff.
3. As benard_madoff was enjoying his time on the plot once again without being attacked, MrRoyaltys at 9:32pm banned bernard_madoff, PrestiegeIX and ASexualDinosaur from the plot.
4. At 9:35pm, while still on the plot, and not having been properly notified or warned in-game by the Plot Owner MrRoyaltys or Peace Officer present, the Minister of Justice SoggehToast without proper probable cause or notice assaulted and then improperly detained and removed bernard_madoff from c-7-high-st.
5. Not knowing he was being detained, berrnad_madoff under the assumption that this was police brutality and not knowing he was being arrested, attempted to flee to protect his life and flee to safety via teleportation. After which he was again improperly detained without probable cause by being uncuffed and re-cuffed again by Peace Officer and particular individual SoggehToast.
6. At 9:38pm, after languishing in custody without any information, the Plaintiff was finally informed of his rights and charge.
7. The Plaintiff was jailed for 10 minutes, without ever being convicted of or pleading guilty to Trespassing.
8. The Plaintiff was never and has never been legally convicted of, charged with, or admitted guilt to Trespassing.
9. The Crown, as employer of the Minister of Justice SoggehToast who was acting in his official capacity as a Peace Officer with the Ministry of Jusice, is liable for the actions here within that SogggehToast took during this particular incident.


IV. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF:

COUNT I: VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

1. Among the many other procedural deviations, unlawful acts, and undue harm done to the Plaintiff, a major thread that runs through them all is the wonton violation of the Plaintiff's Constitutional Rights.
2. §22 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria outlines the various rights and freedoms of Alexandrian Citizens, including the right to peacefully assemble, the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judicial Officer and to be informed of the nature of the charges brought against them, the right to be equal before the law, and right to life, liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof.
3. The Plaintiff's right to peacefully assemble was violated when he was violently removed from c-7-high-st.
4. The Plaintiff's right to a speedy and fair trial was violated when he was unlawfully detained and jailed without a trial by the Crown.
5. The Plaintiff's right to be equal before the law was violated when he was punished without a trial.
6. The Plaintiff's right to life, liberty and security was violated when he was assaulted, murdered and unlawfully jailed by an agent acting on behalf of the Crown.
7. Due to these egregious violation of the Plaintiff's rights, the Plaintiff is seeking £20,000 in compensatory redress for the overall violation of his Constitutional Rights by the Crown.

COUNT II: EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE
1. During the time leading upto and during the course of the Plaintiff's unlawful detainment, he was subject to abuse by extension of the crown as a particular individual, Minister of Justice SoggehToast.
2. These abuses of the plaintiff include Assault and Murder, which under A.P. 01-006 | Criminal Code and Procedure Act are considered to be a violent misdemeanor and felony offense respectively.
3. Due to having these crimes being committed against him by the Crown, the Plaintiff is seeking compensatory redress equvialent to the maximum fine for one count of each offense under the Criminal Code and Procedure Act: £1,000 and £5,000 respectively for Assault and Murder, totaling £6,000.

COUNT III: UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT
1. Under § 20 (5)(b) of A.P. 01-006 | Criminal Code and Procedure Act, the maximum punishment for Trespassing is 10 minutes in Jail.
2. Under § 9 (1) of A.P. 01-006 | Criminal Code and Procedure Act, a peace officer may only summarily issue a punishment as described if both sides agree a crime occurred.
3. The Plaintiff has never been convicted of, charged with or admitted to being guilty of Trespassing, meaning his jailing was unwarranted and unlawful.
4. By jailing the Plaintiff without arraignment, formal charges, and a trial, the Crown not only violated proper procedure and due process of the courts as the proper judges of guilt of criminal acts, but additionally violated the Plaintiff's right to liberty, a speed and fair trial, as well as the right to be equal under the law as previously mentioned in Count I of this section.
5. Due to being unlawfully imprisoned, the Plaintiff is seeking £2,000 in compensatory redress per minute of being unlawfully jailed, totaling £20,000 for the 10 minutes he spent unlawfully jailed.

COUNT IV: EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
1. The Plaintiff, as a result of the actions taken by the Crown, was unduly harmed and suffered extreme emotional distress and pain as a result of the unlawful wonton actions taken by the crown as described above.
2. As a new player and an innovator with a childlike sense of play and wonder, the Plaintiff bernard_madoff no longer feels safe to walk the streets of Alexandria without being harassed and harangued once again by a renegade Peace Officer under the protection and authority off the Crown to further deprive his Constitutional Rights.
3. Due to this ongoing distress, pain and suffering, the Plaintiff seeks £6,000 in compensatory redress for his ongoing needs going forward.


V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
With the above claims for relief in mind, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Honourable Court:

1. Award all compensatory damages to the Plaintiff as discussed in the Claims for Relief, totaling an amount of £52,000.
2. Award the Plaintiff's costs for this suit.
3. Award the Plaintiff with punitive damages in an amount that the court deems fit.
4. Grant further and other relief as the court deems fit.


Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
3/25/2026


Proof of Representation of the Plaintiff:

represent.png
 
Last edited:
MagistrateSeal.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS



The Crown's rightfully appointed counsel is commanded to appear before the Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in

Case 5 (Mag Ct., 2026)

bernard_madoff
Plaintiff

v.

The Crown
Defendant

They are hereby required to do so within seventy-two (72) hours. Failure to do so may result in a default judgment.

So ordered,
Magistrate Gribble19
 
Back
Top