Lawsuit: Adjourned Crown v. Dearev, Case 22 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nim

Member
Nimq_
Nimq_
Researcher
Joined
Apr 12, 2025
Messages
154
Criminal Complaint
Case Title:
Crown v. Dearev
Initiator: Constable Nimq_ (Ministry of Justice, Peace Officer)
Court of Filing: Magistrates’ Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria
Date of Filing: 10/26/2025


I. Jurisdiction​

This complaint is filed under §9(1) of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act (A.P. 01‑006), authorizing peace officers to file charges before the Magistrates’ Court.
The alleged events occurred within the municipality of NewHamilton, well within Alexandrian jurisdiction.


II. Defendant Information​

  • Name (IGN): Dearev
  • Status: Resident
  • Known Residence: NewHamilton
  • Custody Status: Released on Recognizance


III. Charges​

Count 1 — Murder (Felony Offense)
  • Statute Violated: § 21(2)(a) Criminal Code and Procedure Act
  • Definition: “A player is guilty of murder if they intentionally and knowingly or with extreme recklessness kill another player without consent from the other.”
  • Maximum Punishment: £ 5,000 Fine + 60 Minutes in Jail


IV. Statement of Facts​

On or about 10/25/2025 at 23:26:09, within NewHamilton (1798, 93, 2896), the defendant Dearev intentionally killed PrestigeIX during an unprovoked confrontation.
Evidence collected at the scene identifies:
  • Victim: PrestigeIX
  • Attacker: Dearev (100%)
  • Location: NewHamilton (1798, 93, 2896)
  • Time: 10/25/2025 23:26:09
Digital forensic data (the “Blood Splatter” evidence) confirms Dearev as the attacker, with 100% certainty, consistent with server records.
Further, chat logs contain the defendant’s own admission:
“okay i did murder prestie but i would never threaten her majesty.”
This constitutes a voluntary admission supporting the factual basis of guilt.


V. Evidence Submitted​

P‑001Screenshot of “Blood Splatter” item showing PrestigeIX (victim) and Dearev (attacker 100 %)
P‑002Screenshot of in‑world chat log showing self‑admission by Dearev
[th]
Exhibit ID​
[/th][th]
Description​
[/th]​
All material was obtained lawfully under §6 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act during routine investigative duties of a Peace Officer.


VI. Legal Basis​

Both statutory elements under §5 are satisfied:
  • Actus Reus (“Guilty Act”) — The deliberate killing of another player (PrestigeIX).
  • Mens Rea (“Guilty Mind”) — Intentional initiation of combat resulting in death, without consent or lawful justification.
No evidence indicates self‑defense, necessity, duress, or any other affirmative defense (§ 12).


VII. Relief and Prayer for Order​

The Crown respectfully requests that the Magistrates’ Court:
  1. Accept this complaint and docket it for proceedings under § 9(1);
  2. Summon Dearev to appear before the Court;
  3. If the defendant admits the offense, authorize immediate imposition of punishment consistent with § 21(2)(a); or
  4. If the defendant disputes the sentence only, schedule a penalty hearing under § 9(1) for sentencing determination;


VIII. Oath and Affirmation​

I, Constable Nimq_, being duly authorized as a Peace Officer of the Kingdom of Alexandria, do solemnly affirm that the foregoing statement is true to the best of my knowledge, belief, and investigative record.

Signed:
– Constable Nimq_
Ministry of Justice, Alexandria
Date: 10/26/2025
Filed before: Magistrates’ Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria
 

Attachments

  • P-002.png
    P-002.png
    18.4 KB · Views: 9
  • P-001.png
    P-001.png
    25.3 KB · Views: 9
MCA.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@Dearev is required to appear before the Magistrates' Court In the case of
Crown v. Dearev, Case 22 (Mag. Ct., 2025)


Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons may result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

All parties will make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures (General and Magistrates).​
 
In consideration of §10 from the Criminal Code and Procedure Act the court will ask if the Defendant wishes to provide an answer to the criminal complaint.

In line with §14.1 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act as well as §16.2.c of the Government Organization Act the court informs the defendant of their right to legal representation and they may request a public defender if they so choose.

The defendant, @Dearev or their counsel has 48 hours to inform the court of their intent or lack thereof to provide an answer.​
 
Apologies your Honor I've attached the wrong file for p-002. Here is the actual file that was meant to be attached.
 

Attachments

  • P-002.png
    P-002.png
    30.2 KB · Views: 5
In consideration of §10 from the Criminal Code and Procedure Act the court will ask if the Defendant wishes to provide an answer to the criminal complaint.

In line with §14.1 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act as well as §16.2.c of the Government Organization Act the court informs the defendant of their right to legal representation and they may request a public defender if they so choose.

The defendant, @Dearev or their counsel has 48 hours to inform the court of their intent or lack thereof to provide an answer.​
i do not wish to make a response, i plead guilty.
 
Following §9.1 of Criminal Code and Procedure Act, while the peace officer and player agree that a crime has occurred - It is unclear to the court if the Crown and Defendant have agreed upon an acceptable punishment.

@Nim / @Dearev please inform this court if this agreement has or has not occurred and whether or not we should move onto a penalty hearing.
 
Yes your Honor. The defendant has agreed to a £100 fine and 10 minutes in jail.
 
MCA.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Ruling on Plea Deal

The court accepts the plea deal between the Crown and the Defendant.

I will rule that the defendant @Dearev is hereby charged with one count of murder.

Dearev will be fined £100 and sentenced to 10 minutes in jail.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top