Lawsuit: Pending Crown v. LukeyyyMC_, Case 23 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

SoggehToast

SoggehToast

Member
Moderator
SoggehToast
SoggehToast
Minister for Justice
Joined
Apr 18, 2025
Messages
49

moj.webp
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA

CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

lukeyyyMC_
Defendant​

I. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
On November 2nd, 2025, during an official court proceeding, the Defendant made threats against Magistrate gribble19, warning he was a "powerful man leading the mafia," and stating he and his mafia would kill gribble19 unless she rendered a Not Guilty verdict in his favor. This deliberate act of intimidation constitutes an Obstruction of Justice.

II. PARTIES
  1. The Crown
  2. lukeyyyMC
III. FACTS
  1. On October 1st, 2025, the Crown filed The Crown v. LukeyyyMC_ & lucaaasserole, Case 19 (Mag. Ct., 2025), charging lukeyyyMC_ on 14 counts of Murder and 1 count of Obstruction of Justice.
  2. Just before direct examination began, lukeyyyMC threatened gribble19, stating that he and his mafia would kill her unless she issued a Not Guilty verdict.
  3. This threat was made to influence, intimidate, and coerce Magistrate gribble19 into rendering a favorable verdict, regardless of the substance of the case against him or the merits of the charges.
IV. ARGUMENT

By intimidating a Magistrate into rendering a Not Guilty verdict, the Defendant violated A.P.01-006 Sec. (7)(a):

(a) Obstruction of Justice - A player is guilty of obstruction of justice if they willfully and deliberately act in a manner which hinders the apprehension, conviction, defense, or punishment of any player.
(i) Maximum Punishment: £1,000 Fine + 10 minutes in jail.
Click to expand...

The Defendant's threat intentionally obstructed the judicial process by attempting to corrupt Magistrate gribble19's impartial judgment.

V. CHARGES

Defendant lukeyyyMC_:
1. Violation of CCPA Sec. (7)(a) - Obstruction of Justice


VI. EVIDENCE:

P-001.png
 
MCA.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@lukeyyyMC is required to appear before the Magistrates' Court In the case of

Crown v. LukeyyyMC_, Case 23 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons may result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

All parties will make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures (General and Magistrates).​
 
SoggehToast said:

View attachment 957
IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA

CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

lukeyyyMC_
Defendant​

I. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
On November 2nd, 2025, during an official court proceeding, the Defendant made threats against Magistrate gribble19, warning he was a "powerful man leading the mafia," and stating he and his mafia would kill gribble19 unless she rendered a Not Guilty verdict in his favor. This deliberate act of intimidation constitutes an Obstruction of Justice.

II. PARTIES
  1. The Crown
  2. lukeyyyMC
III. FACTS
  1. On October 1st, 2025, the Crown filed The Crown v. LukeyyyMC_ & lucaaasserole, Case 19 (Mag. Ct., 2025), charging lukeyyyMC_ on 14 counts of Murder and 1 count of Obstruction of Justice.
  2. Just before direct examination began, lukeyyyMC threatened gribble19, stating that he and his mafia would kill her unless she issued a Not Guilty verdict.
  3. This threat was made to influence, intimidate, and coerce Magistrate gribble19 into rendering a favorable verdict, regardless of the substance of the case against him or the merits of the charges.
IV. ARGUMENT

By intimidating a Magistrate into rendering a Not Guilty verdict, the Defendant violated A.P.01-006 Sec. (7)(a):



The Defendant's threat intentionally obstructed the judicial process by attempting to corrupt Magistrate gribble19's impartial judgment.

V. CHARGES

Defendant lukeyyyMC_:
1. Violation of CCPA Sec. (7)(a) - Obstruction of Justice


VI. EVIDENCE:

View attachment 958
Click to expand...

OPENING STATEMENT​

This is utterly out of context and lukeyyyMC clearly here is speaking figuratively and has no intention to do what he says. If the prosecution could provide ANY evidence of lukeyyyMC at the front of a criminal organisation then this case would be worth my time so please just crack on and lets get this sorted in 3-2 business days?

1762329539544.png
 
Last edited:
pricelessAgrari said:
Ts pmo, sybau twin 😭🙏💔
Click to expand...
@pricelessAgrari is hereby charged with 1 count of Contempt of Court for speaking in a case they were not summoned to speak in per the General Court Rules and Procedures.
PricelessAgrari will be fined £100.
​
lucaaasserole said:

OPENING STATEMENT​

This is utterly out of context and lukeyyyMC clearly here is speaking figuratively and has no intention to do what he says. If the prosecution could provide ANY evidence of lukeyyyMC at the front of a criminal organisation then this case would be worth my time so please just crack on and lets get this sorted in 3-2 business days?

View attachment 969
Click to expand...

The court will accept this as the defendants answer to the complaint.

Following §10.2 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act we will enter into discovery.
Parties should take note of entreaties outlined in §10.3 during discovery.

Parties will have 72 hours to provide discovery and may agree to end discovery early if they so choose.

@SoggehToast / @lucaaasserole


​
 
yo wassup everyone, firstly i'd like to say luca is not my lawyer. he has forged this evidence and i will be defending myself, please charge him with perjury or smth idk. secondly i would like to say, doesnt alexandria have summary crimes? cant you just get the evidence and charge me without having to go through all this bullshit
 
Last edited:
Okay it wasnt forged but i will no longer serve as his lawyer if he does not want me to anymore 😛

(I'll be a good boy)
 
I will ignore the remarks from @lucaaasserole, they are dismissed from these proceedings - further comments from them without prompting will result in contempt charges.

Per §10 from the Criminal Code and Procedure Act the court prompts @lukeyyyMC if they wish to provide an answer to the criminal complaint.

In line with §14.1 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act as well as §16.2.c of the Government Organization Act the court informs the defendant of their right to legal representation and they may request a public defender if they so choose.

The defendant, or their counsel has 48 hours to inform the court of their intent or lack thereof to provide an answer, or if they wish to have a public defender assigned to them.

If the defendant so chooses to request for summary judgement the court will allow them to do so, but I will remind you that you have a right to a legal defense and a public defender may be assigned free of charge to you.​
 
Answer to complaint

I am a powerful man who shouldn't have to waste this time with this garbage so let me say it 1 last time.
I am the Don of a Mafia with 19 members, if you don't give me a not guilty verdict I will kill you and Gribble over and over whilst also doing terrorist attacks on plots and killing all civilians we see, do you understand?

This is your final warning.
 
lukeyyyMC said:
Answer to complaint

I am a powerful man who shouldn't have to waste this time with this garbage so let me say it 1 last time.
I am the Don of a Mafia with 19 members, if you don't give me a not guilty verdict I will kill you and Gribble over and over whilst also doing terrorist attacks on plots and killing all civilians we see, do you understand?

This is your final warning.
Click to expand...
Following §10.2 of the Criminal Code and Procedure Act we will enter into discovery.
Parties should take note of entreaties outlined in §10.3 during discovery.

Parties will now have 72 hours to provide discovery and may agree to end discovery early if they so choose.

@SoggehToast / @lukeyyyMC​
 
I don't know who you think you are Dino. You have no power, so don't try. This is really your final warning before I unleash hell upon the entire server. This IS a threat.
 
The Crown will have 72 hours to provide their opening statements.
Once the Crown provides their statements, the defendant will have 72 hours to provide their opening statements.

Given that no Witnesses were called, we will move onto Closing statements after this with the same deadlines.
72 hours for closing for the Crown and then the defendant.

@SoggehToast / @lukeyyyMC​
 
OPENING STATEMENT
ENTREATY FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Your Honor,

The facts of this case are undisputed and plainly documented. The Defendant openly and willfully intimidated the presiding Magistrate by threatening lethal violence unless a favorable verdict was rendered. As shown in Exhibit P-001, the Defendant stated he would “not take no for an answer” and threatened to have Magistrate Gribble19 killed by his mafia. This statement was made deliberately, directly, and in the context of an active judicial proceeding.

While it is unclear which facts the defense intends to contest, there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact. Exhibit P-001, together with the official forum records, conclusively demonstrates that this threat occurred and that it violated A.P.01-006 Sec. (7)(a). Proceeding to a lengthy trial would not serve the interests of justice or judicial efficiency. Accordingly, the Crown respectfully requests that this Court grant summary judgment in this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
IN THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
REQUEST TO RESCIND ENTREATY FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Your Honor,

Upon further consideration, the Crown withdraws its request for summary judgment, as that terminology is obviously not applicable in this criminal proceeding. The Crown formally withdraws these entreaties, which were filed in error, and respectfully requests that the Court proceed with this matter as expeditiously and efficiently as possible, as there are no material facts in dispute, and apologizes for any delay thus far.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
Since neither party provided their openings, I'm going to reduce the times for closing statements in hopes we can move this along quickly.
If either party requires an extension of time, please request it as such.

The Crown will have 48 hours to provide their closing statements.
Once the Crown provides their statements, the defendant will have 48 hours to provide their closing statements.

@SoggehToast / @lukeyyyMC​
 
IN THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY OF PROMPTING

Your Honor,

The Crown respectfully requests that this Court correct a minor procedural error. According to CCPA 10(5)(e), the Defence is expected to provide closing statements before the Crown. This ensures the Crown, which bears the burden of proof in criminal proceedings, can rebut any arguments offered by the Defense against their case.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
SoggehToast said:
IN THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY OF PROMPTING

Your Honor,

The Crown respectfully requests that this Court correct a minor procedural error. According to CCPA 10(5)(e), the Defence is expected to provide closing statements before the Crown. This ensures the Crown, which bears the burden of proof in criminal proceedings, can rebut any arguments offered by the Defense against their case.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
Click to expand...
So it shall be.

@lukeyyyMC -- You may provide your closing statements within 48 hours of this post if you so choose.
If you do not intend to provide statements, it would be appreciated if you'd inform the court as such.​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top