IN THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your Honor,
This case could not be any more straightforward.
P-001 establishes beyond any reasonable doubt that the Defendant violently threatened Magistrate Gribble19 during a court proceeding. He explicitly stated that he was a "powerful man leading a mafia," threatening Gribble19 with the intention of coercing her into rendering a Not Guilty verdict in his favor. This was a deliberate attempt to corrupt a Magistrate's impartial judgment and poison the judicial process.
This action constitutes a violation of CCPA Sec. (7)(a). The Defendant willfully and deliberately hindered the judicial process in an attempt to escape justice.
The Crown respectfully requests that this Court find the Defendant guilty as charged.
Respectfully submitted,
Soggeh. T Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA HEAR YE’ HEAR YE’ THE VERDICT HATH ARRIVED
Position of Parties
The Crown’s position is that the defendant has committed the crime of Obstruction of Justice by “Intimidating a Magistrate into rendering a Not Guilty verdict.”
The defendant’s position is that they are “a powerful man who shouldn’t have to waste this[sic] time with this garbage” and “I am the Don of a Mafia with 19 members”
The Crown believes that the defendant ‘violently threatened’ Magistrate Gribble19, and that this was a ‘deliberate attempt to corrupt a Magistrate’s impartial judgement’
Review
In Case 19 (Mag. Ct., 2025) LukeyyyMC issued a statement that they are ‘leading a mafia’ and that ‘we will kill you if you don’t give a Not Guilty Verdict’ as seen in P-001 and on the record.
While it may be the case that LukeyyyMC threatened the judicial officer into providing a verdict in their favor, there is still the question of whether or not this is considered obstruction of justice as defined in A.P.01-006 § 20.7.a “Obstruction of Justice - A player is guilty of obstruction of justice if they willfully and deliberately act in a manner which hinders the apprehension, conviction, defense, or punishment of any player.”
So, did LukeyyyMC by issuing threats of violence - “hinder the apprehension, conviction, defense, or punishment of any player”?
I find it unlikely that the defendant’s actions hindered their potential conviction or punishment. The Crown has not demonstrated that the recipient of the perceived threats found them to be obstructive to their work, nor has their work seemingly been affected by the comments of the defendant.
While I do believe that the defendant was serious in their threats, as they have levied similar threats in my courtroom - The judiciary has tools to handle those who speak out of turn - additionally there’s a specific court crime for those who disrespect a judicial officer (Id. at § 18.2.a)
I do not believe that the crime of ‘Obstruction of Justice’ had occurred in consideration of the evidence levied against the defendant and the lack of testimony that might support this point.
While it’s possible that other crimes may have been committed such as the aforementioned ‘Contempt of a Judicial Officer’, or some other crime within A.P.01-006, the crime of Obstruction of Justice has not occurred here.
The court finds the defendant NOT GUILTY on the charge of Obstruction of Justice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.