Lawsuit: Pending ItsStormcraft v. The Crown, Case 14 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

TheStormcrafter

Moderator
Moderator
ItsStormcraft
ItsStormcraft
Parliament Clerk
Joined
Apr 12, 2025
Messages
159
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Civil Complaint

I. Jurisdictional Statement
This lawsuit concerns a matter of unlawful dismissal of myself, ItsStormcraft, from the position of Electoral Adjudicator. Under the recent dismissal of The Greens v. Crown, it certainly does not fall under "disputes regarding elections" and should therefore be heard in the Magistrates' Court.

II. Parties
ItsStormcrafter, fmr. Electoral Adjudicator
The Crown, represented by the Ministry of Justice

III. Facts
(1) Under the Government Organisation Act §14, removing the Electoral Adjudicator requires a majority of two-thirds.
(2) As determined by the Prime Minister, Gwiis is still a Member of Parliament (E1).
(3) Therefore Parliament has no vacancies. This puts the supermajority threshold at eight.
(4) There where only seven Ayes so far on the Motion to Remove (the proxy vote cast by hello1341 is null due to N8 casting the vote himself) (E2).
(5) The majority threshold was never reached, the subsequent nomination of McBrittle419 was therefore void ab initio.

IV. Argument
As the majority threshold was never reached, I am still Electoral Adjudicator at this time. The nomination of Brittle was void ab initio and has to be voided and refiled should I be removed properly. I was therefore wrongly dismissed from my position and McBrittle419 is currently unlawfully exercising the powers of the Secretary of Elections.

V. Petition
(1) Reinstate maself as Electoral Adjudicator.
(2) Void the nomination of McBrittle419.
(3) Void all actions taken by McBrittle419 as Electoral Adjudicator.

So petitioned before the honourable Court,
Kaladin Stormblessed

1790069155112.png
1790069272430.png
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Entreaty for Emergency Injunction

Due to the highly sensitive nature of elections and immediate need for the General Election to be conducted, I ask the court to grant interim relief by suspending Brittle and either:
a. reinstating me
b. entrusting the Directors to conduct the election

So petitioned before the honourable Court,
Kaladin Stormblessed
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Entreaty of Prompting

As there currently are no Magistrates and this case is highly time sensitive, I prompt that the honourable Chancery send down a Chancellor to preside over this case.

So petitioned before the honourable Court,
Kaladin Stormblessed

@AsexualDinosaur @Smallfries @Talion77
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
Case No.
14
ENTREATY TO DISMISS


Your Honor,

As the duly appointed representative of the Crown, I both make my apperance known and move for this case to be dismissed, hopefully with prejudice.

The Plaintiff seems to be mistaken regarding the number of members currently in Parliament. While GWIIs is still a sitting member, another member of the Order of the Scarlet Rose party, JunoAndrist, was impeached on 9/10/2026 via a successful Motion to Impeach in Parliament.(See P-001 and P-002).

Under the Alexandrian Electoral Act, "If Parliament has been convened for 77 days or longer, or a General Election is scheduled within two weeks of the vacancy opening, a Special Election will not be called, and the seat shall remain vacant for the remainder of the term." See A.P. 00-018 §11(1)(a).

Parliament was first seated on June 24, 2026. JunoAndrist was removed on 9/10/2026, 78 days after Parliament first convened. Additionally, a General Election was scheduled to take place on 9/19/2026. Furthermore, no Motion was ever made to fill the vacant Member of Parliament's Seat within the statutory 72 hour timeline. See A.P. 00-018 §11(1). This means that JunoAndrist's seat was, and still is as of this moment, vacant pending the upcoming general election per statute.

Given that Parliament has 1 vacancy, that means there are 10 sitting members. A super-majority therefore only requires 7 votes.

Given that this case rests upon the fact that there are no vacancies in Parliament to justify a Super Majority and there is in fact a vacancy to justify the Super Majority, the Crown moves for this case to be dismissed with its entirety with prejudice.

P-001.png

P-002.png

P-003.png


Respectfully submitted,
Stephen W. Spooner Jr.
Solicitor General of Alexandria.
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
Case No.
14
ENTREATY TO DISMISS


Your Honor,

As the duly appointed representative of the Crown, I both make my apperance known and move for this case to be dismissed, hopefully with prejudice.

The Plaintiff seems to be mistaken regarding the number of members currently in Parliament. While GWIIs is still a sitting member, another member of the Order of the Scarlet Rose party, JunoAndrist, was impeached on 9/10/2026 via a successful Motion to Impeach in Parliament.(See P-001 and P-002).

Under the Alexandrian Electoral Act, "If Parliament has been convened for 77 days or longer, or a General Election is scheduled within two weeks of the vacancy opening, a Special Election will not be called, and the seat shall remain vacant for the remainder of the term." See A.P. 00-018 §11(1)(a).

Parliament was first seated on June 24, 2026. JunoAndrist was removed on 9/10/2026, 78 days after Parliament first convened. Additionally, a General Election was scheduled to take place on 9/19/2026. Furthermore, no Motion was ever made to fill the vacant Member of Parliament's Seat within the statutory 72 hour timeline. See A.P. 00-018 §11(1). This means that JunoAndrist's seat was, and still is as of this moment, vacant pending the upcoming general election per statute.

Given that Parliament has 1 vacancy, that means there are 10 sitting members. A super-majority therefore only requires 7 votes.

Given that this case rests upon the fact that there are no vacancies in Parliament to justify a Super Majority and there is in fact a vacancy to justify the Super Majority, the Crown moves for this case to be dismissed with its entirety with prejudice.





Respectfully submitted,
Stephen W. Spooner Jr.
Solicitor General of Alexandria.
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Objection | Breach of Procedure

ConsequencesInc is not a summoned party to this case and therefore cannot file Entreaties. The Entreaty has therefore been filed out-of-turn.

So objected before the honourable Court,
Kaladin Stormblessed
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Objection | Breach of Procedure

ConsequencesInc is not a summoned party to this case and therefore cannot file Entreaties. The Entreaty has therefore been filed out-of-turn.

So objected before the honourable Court,
Kaladin Stormblessed


IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
Case No.
14
Objection - Breach of Procedure.

Your Honor,

I am not ConsequencesInc. The Plaintiff, despite being able to read the law, cannot properly read the end of my post.

If they has a problem with my filings on behalf of the Crown, who is a listed party in this case, they may address me by name Crown given name: Stephen W. Spooner Jr.

A courtroom is built on respect, and I would hope he would be held to at least that point of civility of calling me by my actual and preferred name. I request the Plaintiff be admonished to the highest degree possible and directed to refer to me either as "the Crown", "the Defense" or "The Defendant(s)", "Stephen W. Spooner Jr." or "Mr. Spooner Jr."

Only my friends may call me just Stephen, and the Plaintiff has not earned that respect from me by using a name that is not mine.

I herby object to his out of turn objection, and request he refer to me as stated above.

Respectfully submitted,
Stephen W. Spooner Jr.
Solicitor General of Alexandria.
 
Last edited:
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION
Case No.
14
Objection - Breach of Procedure.

Your Honor,

I am not ConsequencesInc. The Plaintiff, despite being able to read the law, cannot properly read the end of my post.

If they has a problem with my filings on behalf of the Crown, who is a listed party in this case, they may address me by name Crown given name: Stephen W. Spooner Jr.

A courtroom is built on respect, and I would hope he would be held to at least that point of civility of calling me by my actual and preferred name. I request the Plaintiff be admonished to the highest degree possible and directed to refer to me either as "the Crown", "the Defense" or "The Defendant(s)", "Stephen W. Spooner Jr." or "Mr. Spooner Jr."

Only my friends may call me just Stephen, and the Plaintiff has not earned that respect from me by using a name that is not mine.

I herby object to his out of turn objection, and request he refer to me as stated above.

Respectfully submitted,
Stephen W. Spooner Jr.
Solicitor General of Alexandria.
IN THE MAGISTRATES' COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
Re: Objection

The Crown is not a summoned party to this case so ConsequencesInc cannot possible be counsel representing the crown. In regards to this not being there name, both their username on the forums and their in-game name are listed as "ConsequencesInc" so referring to them as such cannot possibly be an issue.
I'd also like to note that while calling on me to be respectful, ConsequencesInc alleges I cannot properly read. I have seen the end of your post and know which position you hold, but just because I am President of the Greens and my signature reflects that, I am not suing for the Greens here.

So responded before the honourable Court,
Kaladin Stormblessed
 
Back
Top