- Joined
- Apr 12, 2025
- Messages
- 87
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
APPEAL AND CRIMINAL MATTER
Case No.: 7
BETWEEN:
McBrittle419
Applicant/Defendant
v.
THE CROWN OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Respondent/Prosecution
I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT AND VENUE
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this suit pursuant to Part III, §14 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria which vests judicial power in the courts to interpret and administer the law.
2. The Magistrate Court is the proper venue for this suit as an appeal to a summary offense, pursuant to §9 (2) of the A.P. 4-019 | Criminal Procedure Act which grants this particular court jurisdiction over appeals to summary offenses.
II. Appeal Request
3. On April 21st, 2026, my client the former Queen of Alexandria and particular individual Her Majesty McBrittle419, was arrested by Peace Officer and particular individual PhillinDeBlanc and summarily charged with Murder, incurring a fine of £600 and a sentence of 30 seconds in jail.
4. As Her Majesty's Legal Representative and a particular individual, I contacted the Ministry of Justice directly to try and appeal this summary charge. On April 24th, I was told by the particular individual and Minister of Justice SoggehToast that it was denied and to challenge further I should file with this particular court, the Magistrates Court.
5. Pursuant to §9 (2) and (3) of the A.P. 4-019 | Criminal Procedure Act, this filing before the honorable court constitutes my client's official notice of appeal as a particular individual. We request this be granted posthaste as the Criminal Procedure Act guarantees that my client as a particular individual shall receive a full trial before the court upon appeal, wherein the Crown as a particular individual shall prove my client's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as a particular individual, or else these charges and punishment she has received will be reversed.
6. For the criminal trial that occurs after appeal, I request that it be held as a direct continuation of this action and that the Crown, as a particular individual, brings the charges that it assumes to suppose to believe should continue to be held against my client as a particular individual, as is now established procedure in these cases. See Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct. 2026).
Respectfully Submitted,
ConsequencesInc
4/27/2026
Proof of Representation of the Applicant/Defendant
APPEAL AND CRIMINAL MATTER
Case No.: 7
BETWEEN:
McBrittle419
Applicant/Defendant
v.
THE CROWN OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Respondent/Prosecution
I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT AND VENUE
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this suit pursuant to Part III, §14 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria which vests judicial power in the courts to interpret and administer the law.
2. The Magistrate Court is the proper venue for this suit as an appeal to a summary offense, pursuant to §9 (2) of the A.P. 4-019 | Criminal Procedure Act which grants this particular court jurisdiction over appeals to summary offenses.
II. Appeal Request
3. On April 21st, 2026, my client the former Queen of Alexandria and particular individual Her Majesty McBrittle419, was arrested by Peace Officer and particular individual PhillinDeBlanc and summarily charged with Murder, incurring a fine of £600 and a sentence of 30 seconds in jail.
4. As Her Majesty's Legal Representative and a particular individual, I contacted the Ministry of Justice directly to try and appeal this summary charge. On April 24th, I was told by the particular individual and Minister of Justice SoggehToast that it was denied and to challenge further I should file with this particular court, the Magistrates Court.
5. Pursuant to §9 (2) and (3) of the A.P. 4-019 | Criminal Procedure Act, this filing before the honorable court constitutes my client's official notice of appeal as a particular individual. We request this be granted posthaste as the Criminal Procedure Act guarantees that my client as a particular individual shall receive a full trial before the court upon appeal, wherein the Crown as a particular individual shall prove my client's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as a particular individual, or else these charges and punishment she has received will be reversed.
6. For the criminal trial that occurs after appeal, I request that it be held as a direct continuation of this action and that the Crown, as a particular individual, brings the charges that it assumes to suppose to believe should continue to be held against my client as a particular individual, as is now established procedure in these cases. See Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct. 2026).
Respectfully Submitted,
ConsequencesInc
4/27/2026
Proof of Representation of the Applicant/Defendant