Lawsuit: Pending Plura72 v Crown, Case 14 (Ch. 2025)

[ameslap]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION

Case No.: 14

Plura72 (Ameslap Representing)
Applicant/Plaintiff

v.

The Crown
Respondent/Defendant

CASE FILING​

1. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT​

The Chancery has jurisdiction of this suit pursuant to the Alexandrian Constitution, specifically Part 3-15 stating: "with exclusive jurisdiction over constitutional questions, including the interpretation and application of the Constitution, as well as disputed returns arising from elections, including challenges to election results".

2. PARTIES​

1. Plura72 (also known as the Application or Plaintiff in this case) was a direct mandate, independent candidate for the October Parliament Elections until the Crown removed them from the ballot illegally.

2. The Crown of the Kingdom of Alexandria (also known as "The Crown", "Government", "Defendant", and "Respondant") is the legal body recognized for proper service of suits alleging constitutional violations and ultra vires actions by its Ministries. See Reallmza v. The Crown, Case 1 (Ch. 2025).

3. FACTS​

1. The Parliament of Alexandria passed the Alexandrian Electoral Act (A.P.018), and it was signed into law on May 6, 2025.
2. The Constitution of Alexandria is the supreme law of the land.
3. The Ministry of Internal Affairs opened the October 2025 Election declarations on October 13, 2025.
4. The Applicant, as an independent, made their declaration on October 13.
5. The Applicant received 12 "Ayes" on the October Petition.
6. On October 18, the Crown removed the Applicant as a candidate, citing "Lack of Monthly playtime."
7. The Constitution states: "Every citizen has the right to participate in and run for office" (Part 5-22-1).
8. Because of this, the Applicant's removal was unconstitutional.

4. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF:​

1. Text within the Alexandrian Electoral Act that places restrictions on candidate requirements is deemed unconstitutional and struck from the law.
2. The Kingdom of Alexandria administers a redo of the October 2025 Election immediately.

5. STATEMENT OF TRUTH​

I believe that the facts stated in this Claim are true. I swear that any and all statements to the court are the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I understand the ramifications of violation of such oath.
SIGNED. Ameslap. Self-Representing.
This 21st day of October, 2025.

6. Proof of Representation​

Spoiler: Proof

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED TO THE CHANCELLERY FOR REVIEW.

 

[ameslap]

ENTREATY OF ENJOINING AND CONTINUANCE

Your honor,

The plaintiff would like to enjoin this case as Ameslap v Crown is ongoing, and the question at hand will be identical to this case. It would stand to reason that the ruling on Ameslap v Crown will be the same ruling in Plura72 v Crown and as such we would ask that this case be enjoined until the conclusion of Ameslap v Crown.

Respectfully submitted,
Ameslap