Lawsuit: In Session Ref. Rights Collective v Crown, Case 11 (Ch. 2025)

[Zodd]

In agreement, the Chancery sustains Rule 1 to this case. High Chancellor AsexualDinosaur is assigned as presiding officer.

@SoggehToast / @Capt11543
Please let the court know the person(s) handling this case.

The Crown will have 72 hours to respond with their opening statements​

 

[PhillinDeBlanc]

IN THE HONOURABLE CHANCERY
OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION

Case No. 11

Referendum Rights Collective

v.

The Crown
​

Entreaty for Writ of Summary Judgement

Your honour,

As it currently stands, The Crown has not given the court notice of who opposing counsel is, nor have they filed their opening statement, nor have they asked for any extension of the deadline to file their opening statement.

In the interest of preserving the constitutional right of a speedy trial, the Plaintiffs wish to ask this court to offer a summary judgement based on the uncontested facts currently established by this case.

This case has lasted through three different administrations, it is in the interest of the Kingdom and in Justice to finally see this issue put to rest.


Respectfully submitted to the Chancery,
PhillinDeBlanc
On behalf of the Referendum Rights Collective
Dated: November 27, 2025

 

[Zodd]

Recognizing that both @Capt11543 and @SoggehToast are plaintiffs in this case - I have been informed there is only one other member of the MOJ that could possibly handle this case on their side of things.


I find it somewhat perplexing as to why the government of whom the Prime Minister is Capt. and the MoJ Minister is SoggehToast, and a number of the plaintiffs in this case are sitting Parliamentary members - Have not implemented measures to facilitate this, or seemingly made efforts to settle with themselves.


That said, the court is going to summon @ColonelKai to the case, as the Solicitor General of the MoJ and of whom is NOT a plaintiff in this case.


Please inform the court of whom is handling this case.
That person will then:
1. Respond to the entreaty for Summary judgement.
2. Provide an opening statement if applicable.


To be clear, this court is not going to rule on a summary judgement simply because the MoJ of whom is largely composed of plaintiffs in this matter, doesn't show up.​