Lawsuit: Pending SoggehToast v. Crown, Case VI (2026)

[SoggehToast]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CIVIL ACTION


SoggehToast
Applicant/Plaintiff, representing himself alongside MikamiLaw

v.

The Crown
Respondent/Defendant

I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

The Chancery has original jurisdiction over disputing returns arising from elections, including challenges to election results. K.A. Const. Part III, Art. 15 (FriesLaw). This case concerns a Plaintiff who was denied entry into Parliament and seeks to dispute the official June 2026 Election results as purported and certified by the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

II. PARTIES

SoggehToast, an independent candidate in the June 2026 Election (Applicant/Plaintiff)
The Crown (Respondent/Defendant )

III. FACTS

1. The Constitution states that Members of Parliament are to be elected according to a proportional voting system defined by Parliament K.A. Const. Part I, § 5.4 (FriesLaw). The electoral process is defined in the Alexandrian Electoral Act, or A.P.00-018.
2. The Ministry of Internal Affairs opened declarations for the June 2026 Parliament Elections on June 15th.
3. After satisfying all legal requirements provided in A.P.00-018 to run as an independent, including those provided in §5(4), §5(5), and §5(6), the Plaintiff was acknowledged as an independent candidate by the Ministry of Internal Affairs on June 19th, 2026.
4. On June 20th, 2026, the Ministry of Internal Affairs made a post on the June 2026 Election thread, stating which candidates had been accepted. This list included the Plaintiff, who was listed as an independent candidate.
5. Following the closure of the polls, the Ministry tabulated and certified the election results, apportioning five seats to SFA, two seats to the Greens, two seats to ANP, and two seats to TKP.
6. The Ministry's election results post further states that the Plaintiff was eliminated in Round 2 with 6 votes, for apparently failing to surpass quorum. Most tragically, the quorum threshold was 6.45 votes, only 0.45 votes more than the Ministry credited to the Plaintiff.
7. The Ministry of Internal Affairs election results post states that, following the elimination of both independent candidates, the resulting votes, or "final state," following transfers, were as follows:
   • SFA: 32 votes
   • The Greens: 13 votes
   • ANP: 13 votes
   • TKP: 12 votes
8. This result violated §8(4) of A.P.00-018, which provides that "any time a ballot is transferred, it becomes attributed to its highest-ranked contender that has not already achieved quorum or been eliminated." The Ministry incorrectly transferred one ballot from MrRoyaltys to SFA, when it should have been transferred to the Plaintiff.
9. The correct final tally, had the election been conducted according to A.P.00-018, should have been:
   • SFA: 30 votes
   • SoggehToast: 7 votes
   • The Greens: 9 votes
   • ANP: 13 votes
   • TKP: 12 votes
10. Under the correct final tally, the Plaintiff would have met quorum at 7 votes and would therefore have been elected into Parliament under §10(1).

IV. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

V. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. §10(1) of A.P.00-018 guarantees that independents who meet quorum through the procedure outlined in §8 are elected into Parliament. The Ministry of Internal Affairs' erroneous vote tabulation denied the Plaintiff their seat in Parliament, despite the Plaintiff having met quorum.
2. The Constitution provides that Members of Parliament are to be elected according to a proportional voting system defined by Parliament, yet the Ministry of Internal Affairs' election results were based on incorrect ballot transfers, thus violating that proportional voting system under A.P.00-018.

VI. Prayer for Relief

1. That the Plaintiff be seated in the Parliamentary seat to which they are legally entitled.
2. £2,000 in legal fees, to reflect the services rendered by MikamiLaw in its legal representation of the Plaintiff.
3. £500 in damages for lost income caused by the Ministry of Internal Affairs' erroneous tabulation.

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Unemployed Citizen
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[AsexualDinosaur]

IN THE CHANCERY OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Crown (@ThePuffer) is required to appear before the Chancery In the case of

SoggehToast v. Crown, VI (2026)

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons may result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

All parties will make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures (General and Chancery).​

 

[Casualgreyknight]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS

The Crown is present Your Honor, I, Casualgreyknight, will be representing The Crown in this case as a Crown Counselor.

 

[AsexualDinosaur]

Please provide your answer to the complaint within 48 hours.
@Casualgreyknight

Also provide your authorization to represent the Crown in this matter.
@Casualgreyknight | @ThePuffer​

 

[ThePuffer]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS

The Crown is present Your Honor, I, Casualgreyknight, will be representing The Crown in this case as a Crown Counselor.

I, ThePufferOffical, approve to have Casualgreyknight represent the crown on this matter (I was on vacation which was why I was unable to confirm via discord)

 

[Casualgreyknight]

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE

Your Honor,

The Crown requests for a 48 hour continuance of the deadline for its Response to Complaint due to counsel facing Illness irl.

 

[AsexualDinosaur]

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE

Your Honor,

The Crown requests for a 48 hour continuance of the deadline for its Response to Complaint due to counsel facing Illness irl.

Counsel, I can't help but notice that even if the Chancery had accepted this continuance that it is now over 96 hours past due and counting.
Can you explain why we're still waiting and why we shouldn't move onto default judgement?

@Casualgreyknight​

 

[SoggehToast]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Your Honor,

The Crown has had over a week to file their response. I respectfully request that the Chancery grant a Writ of Default Judgment, provided I am afforded the opportunity to submit a brief concerning the relief requested.

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Unemployed Citizen
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[AsexualDinosaur]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Your Honor,

The Crown has had over a week to file their response. I respectfully request that the Chancery grant a Writ of Default Judgment, provided I am afforded the opportunity to submit a brief concerning the relief requested.

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Unemployed Citizen
Kingdom of Alexandria

Granted.
You have 48 hours to submit your brief.​

 

[SoggehToast]

IN THE HONORABLE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
BRIEF

Your Honor,

I will try not to over complicate this case because it is a fairly simple one. The Ministry of Internal Affairs incorrectly tabulated the results of June 2026 Election in violation of §8(4) of A.P.00-018. A single ballot transferred from MrRoyaltys to the Scarlet Flame Alliance should have been transferred to the Plaintiff. That single vote made the difference between the Plaintiff meeting quorum and being eliminated. Under §10(1) of A.P.00-018, independent candidates who meet quorum after the §8 procedure are to be elected to Parliament. As no law has been passed raising the minimum number of seats in Parliament, it remains at eleven. See K.A. Const. Part I, § 5.1 (FriesLaw). Officer Quarters published a recount of the June 2026 Election under the correct §8 procedure and demonstrated that the Greens received an extra seat. See Electoral Watchdog: June 2026 Recalculations (ColonelKai, 2026). On June 20, 2026, the Ministry listed MrNeighbor first and Kaiser_Bismarck second on the Greens' candidate list. Both were admitted into Parliament. Under the corrected count, Kaiser_Bismarck's seat is the one that was attributed incorrectly.

The Plaintiff notes that this procedural error would have been simpler to demonstrate had this case gone to trial and the Court been able to hear witness testimony. However, Queen and Electoral Registrar Juniperfig outright admitted publicly to misreading A.P.00-018. (See P-003, P-002). The Electoral Adjudicator, ItsStormCraft, stated that they could "imagine [it] being true" that the Plaintiff should have been admitted if the votes were correctly transferred. See P-001. The Ministry of Internal Affairs released the election math from both Juniperfig and ItsStormCraft under their "Results" post (#21), and it is abundantly clear that neither individual transferred the ballot in question to the Plaintiff. §8(4) states, "Any time a ballot is transferred, it becomes attributed to its highest-ranked contender that has not already achieved quota or been eliminated." The Scarlet Flame Alliance, having received no fewer than 30 first-preference votes, had well surpassed quota at this stage, and was therefore ineligible to receive that ballot transfer.

The Plaintiff respectfully asks the Court to (1) find that the Ministry of Internal Affairs violated §8(4), (2) declare the Plaintiff elected according to §10(1), and (3) declare Kaiser_Bismarck's admission into Parliament invalid. The allocation math underlying this claim was provided by Officer Quarters. See Electoral Watchdog: June 2026 Recalculations (ColonelKai, 2026). The Plaintiff is willing to elaborate on the specifics further if necessary.

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Unemployed Citizen
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Smallfries]

We find for the Claimant and grant all requested relief. Member of Parliament @Kaiser_Bismarck is to be removed from their position immediately, and @SoggehToast put in their place. This is the judgment of the Chancery, and serves only as a statement of the immediate derived effects of this case. We will post our opinion in full at a later date.