Lawsuit: Dismissed The Crown v. Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77, Case 11 (Mag. Ct., 2025)

[Pepecuu]

Your Honor, I respectfully ask the court not to penalize me for failing to enter a plea. I did not understand that I was required to formally plead guilty or not guilty. I was never notified via Discord or the in-game mailing system. I did not intend to ignore the process, and I have now plead not-guilty as you can view above.

Unfortunately, this Court cannot accept any appeals for Court Crimes such as Contempt of Court. You may appeal these charges in the Chancery.

 

[Pepecuu]

REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION:

Your honour,

It appears other members of Stratton LLC are being used to transfer money to and from each others accounts for the purpose of continuing transactions. They are continuing to attempt to scam others and are doing so. As a result, we ask you freeze the accounts of all defendants at this time.

As can be seen in P-024-2 and P-024-3 attached, Stratton plans to continue offering scam deals to new players, and plans to hide assets on DC in money laundering accounts.

These were obtained through an additional sting operation within Stratton, which was undertaken by Mr. FTLCEO, and was the reason he had not completed a plea as of this time. We intend to request the removal of charges against FTLCEO, as we were not aware when we charged him he was working with Redmont authorities.

An updated version of the discord scrub has been uploaded to the evidence folder labeled P-025 and represents his view of the discord as of today.

Thank you,

Joseph Ibney0
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria

Since the prosecution Motions to Nolle Prosequi (stylised as an emergency injunction) on any charges alleged against FTLCEO (aka 12700k), the Court shall grant this request, and the Prosecution shall amend their case filing to remove any charges against FTLCEO.

 

[Pepecuu]

Given that all Defendants have submitted their pleas, Discovery is now open for 72 hours (Until 26th of June 2025, 2.30am UTC), and either party may request an extension, which can be granted if both parties agree to the extension.

 

[Pepecuu]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Ruling on the Request for an Emergency Injunction by the Prosecution​

After a review by the Court, the Prosecution has combined a Request for an Emergency Injunction and a Motion to Nolle Prosequi into one post, instead of just mislabelling a Motion to Nolle Prosequi as an Emergency Injunction. Therefore, the Court shall rule on the Emergency Injunction part of the post now.

The Court grants the Emergency Injunction in full, and orders all Defendants to cease any and all transfers of funds or assets for the duration of this case, including but not limited to, buying or selling from chestshops, using /unfine or /fine commands, or /pay from either in-game or through a discord bot.

Any violations of this order shall result in severe penalties and additional criminal charges.

 

[Talion77]

Your Honor,
I humbly request that this honourable court lifts the emergency injunction referring to the transfer of my assets for several reasons:

1. As seen in the exhibit, I am as of the 13th of June 2025 no longer an employee of Stratton LLC which makes the argument by the crown for an emergency injunction null against me.

2. I have outstanding debt that needs to be paid as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted (not through my counsel because he is sleeping rn),
Talion77

 

[Pepecuu]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Ruling on the Writ of Reconsideration by Defendant Talion77​

Given the lack of a response by the Prosecution and the evidence provided by the Defendant, the Court grants the Writ of Reconsideration by Defendant Talion77 and rules the Emergency Injunction against Talion77 specifically as null and void, however the Emergency Injunction continues to be applied to the rest of the Defendants.

The Court would like to remind Defendant Talion77 that any actions taken to aid any Defendants in this case or Stratton LLC, it's employees or any agents or representatives, in the transfer of funds or assets, can be grounds for the Prosecution to request a reimposition of the Emergency Injunction.

Accordingly, until stated otherwise, Talion77 is free to move, transfer or use or receive funds and assets located within their personal accounts, unless these assets are transferred from or to one of the Defendants in this case, whether directly or indirectly.

 

[Nyeogmi]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

DISCOVERY SUBMISSION

Defendants Maelzarun and Mr_GrapeJelly would like to submit this evidence.

D-001: This is a screenshot of Stoppers (at the time head of the Exchange) creating an open offer to exchange SC and DC at a 60:1 rate.
D-002: This is a screenshot of Stoppers offering this counsel an 8.5:1 exchange rate inconsistent with the offer.
D-003: This is the Crown asserting that a 1:16 exchange rate was not equitable when ToadKing offered it.
D-004: This is a screenshot of Pepecuu offering a 1:17 exchange rate for SC about an hour ago.
D-005-1: This is a plea agreement barring ToadKing, the current owner of The Exchange, from doing foreign exchange for three months.
D-005-2: This is ToadKing acknowledging that the agreement has this effect.
D-006: This is Taelor announcing that /pay was disabled for Tourists at the Crown's request.

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Nyeogmi]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

ENTREATY TO COMPEL
Pursuant to P-024-1/2/3, Defense entreats the Court to compel the Crown to produce all documents relevant to Crown agents inside Stratton, including agreements between the Crown and agents that may have included reduced prosecution or waiver of sentencing.

Based on current evidence, this would include communications between ibney0 and princessAgrari and communications between ibney0 and FTLCEO

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Pepecuu]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

DISCOVERY SUBMISSION

Defendants Maelzarun and Mr_GrapeJelly would like to submit this evidence.

D-001: This is a screenshot of Stoppers (at the time head of the Exchange) creating an open offer to exchange SC and DC at a 60:1 rate.
D-002: This is a screenshot of Stoppers offering this counsel an 8.5:1 exchange rate inconsistent with the offer.
D-003: This is the Crown asserting that a 1:16 exchange rate was not equitable when ToadKing offered it.
D-004: This is a screenshot of Pepecuu offering a 1:17 exchange rate for SC about an hour ago.
D-005-1: This is a plea agreement barring ToadKing, the current owner of The Exchange, from doing foreign exchange for three months.
D-005-2: This is ToadKing acknowledging that the agreement has this effect.
D-006: This is Taelor announcing that /pay was disabled for Tourists at the Crown's request.

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

The Court acknowledges the evidence submitted by the Defendant's counsel.

 

[Pepecuu]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RULING ON ENTREATY TO COMPEL
​

Given the lack of an objection by the Prosecution, the Court grants this Entreaty, with the Prosecution given 48 (FORTY-EIGHT) hours (Deadline: 29th June, 7.20pm UTC) to produce any relevant materials as requested by the Entreaty by the Defendant.

The list of materials to be produced by the Prosecution is attached below.

All documents relevant to Crown agents inside Stratton, including agreements between the Crown and agents that may have included reduced prosecution or waiver of sentencing.

Based on current evidence, this would include communications between ibney0 and princessAgrari and communications between ibney0 and FTLCEO.

As set out in the case PhillinDeBlanc v. The Crown, when producing the materials that have been compelled, the Prosecution shall submit a log of relevant materials that have been classified, for the Court to conduct an in camera review to determine whether documents are reasonably classified.

 

[Nyeogmi]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

ENTREATY FOR CONSIDERATION
With respect to the previous injunction, Defendant Mr_GrapeJelly asks the court for permission to move personal funds from bank accounts to personal accounts in their name.

This is to keep the funds safe in case of bank failure -- the funds will not be transferred to any other party afterwards.

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Pepecuu]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RULING ON ENTREATY OF CONSIDERATION BY THE DEFENDANTS​

Given the lack of evidence or change in circumstances in relation to their work and employment with Stratton LLC, the Court still has justifiable concerns over the transference of assets between a Stratton employee and an outside third party, potentially with the Defendant as an intermediary to circumvent the Emergency Injunction.

Accordingly, the Defendant's Entreaty of Consideration is denied.

 

[Ibney0]

Your honor,

Defense counsel pointed out to me I should probably clarify, but the Crown operates under the open discovery doctrine. All available evidence regardless of the Crown’s belief on relevance is provided in the google doc link given at the start of the trial.

As such, all discoverable materials have already been provided. If additional relevant evidence appears, the Crown shall provide it immediately.

As for agreements for non-prosecution, you can find it and our conversations here:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1379886414011043950/1389058831127937084/Tickets__A_Discord_Support_Manager_Bot.pdf?ex=68633d58&is=6861ebd8&hm=6b969de787af1ef6ed695eb9c1e0322591e1ec2ee4ab7b6eddd35695d450cb40&

 

[Nyeogmi]

Your honor, for ease of access, the Crown has provided a google drive of all evidence within this case, except for exhibit 15.

Stratton Evidence - Google Drive

drive.google.com

Exhibit 15 can be found here:

Ticket Tool - The #1 Discord support bot

Ticket Tool - Ticketing without clutter - The #1 Discord support bot

tickettool.xyz

With apologies to the Court for addressing opposing counsel directly -- can the Crown please upload this in another form? I cannot access this with my current Discord credentials.

 

[Nyeogmi]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE, ENTREATY TO COMPEL
The defense would like to introduce ibney0's submission as D-007.

Additionally,

Statements in that evidence (entered as D-007-01 and D-007-02) imply the existence of communications between pricelessAgrari, FTLCEO, and Redmont law enforcement about an earlier deal that was structurally similar to the deal they made with the Crown. The defense moves the Court to compel pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO to produce a record of their Stratton-related conversations with Redmont law enforcement.

Additional statements in that evidence (entered as D-007-03) imply that ibney0 received information from Redmont directly about pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO. The defense moves the Court to compel ibney0 to produce their Stratton-related communications with Redmont law enforcement.

The defense moves the Court to compel ibney0 to enter a version of D-007 that includes images which are missing from this archive copy. (an example is entered as D-007-04) In particular, images of necessary context from third-party conversations which were shared between the parties as evidence are seemingly completely missing from the evidence.

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Nyeogmi]

With apologies to the Court for addressing opposing counsel directly -- can the Crown please upload this in another form? I cannot access this with my current Discord credentials.

(A short-term clarification: I specifically mean P-015)

 

[Nyeogmi]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

ENTREATY FOR CONTINUANCE
The Defense still needs an answer on the above requests and expects to need to adapt strategy based on the evidence after it is available. Defendants Maelzarun and Mr_GrapeJelly request an additional 48 hours of discovery to review.

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[12700k]

IN THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA

The Crown v. Stratton LLC, et al.

NOTICE REGARDING IMPROPER INCLUSION IN DEFENDANT LIST

To the Honorable Court and Counsel:
Comes now the undersigned, formerly named as a defendant in this matter, to respectfully notify the Court that I have been formally dismissed from these proceedings.

Nevertheless, I have observed that my name continues to appear among the listed defendants in recent filings. I respectfully request that any and all future pleadings, motions, or related submissions amend the caption and content accordingly to reflect my removal from the case.

Continued reference to me as a defendant is both procedurally inaccurate and may result in reputational harm. I trust this oversight will be rectified promptly.

Respectfully submitted,
12700k
Former Defendant
Dated: 6/30/2025

 

[Pepecuu]

IN THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA

The Crown v. Stratton LLC, et al.

NOTICE REGARDING IMPROPER INCLUSION IN DEFENDANT LIST

To the Honorable Court and Counsel:
Comes now the undersigned, formerly named as a defendant in this matter, to respectfully notify the Court that I have been formally dismissed from these proceedings.

Nevertheless, I have observed that my name continues to appear among the listed defendants in recent filings. I respectfully request that any and all future pleadings, motions, or related submissions amend the caption and content accordingly to reflect my removal from the case.

Continued reference to me as a defendant is both procedurally inaccurate and may result in reputational harm. I trust this oversight will be rectified promptly.

Respectfully submitted,
12700k
Former Defendant
Dated: 6/30/2025

The Court would like to remind the Prosecution (@Ibney0) to remove 12700k from all filings regarding this case, as he is no longer charged as per the agreement between the Prosecution and the Defendant.

 

[Ibney0]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants

INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE, ENTREATY TO COMPEL
The defense would like to introduce ibney0's submission as D-007.

Additionally,

Statements in that evidence (entered as D-007-01 and D-007-02) imply the existence of communications between pricelessAgrari, FTLCEO, and Redmont law enforcement about an earlier deal that was structurally similar to the deal they made with the Crown. The defense moves the Court to compel pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO to produce a record of their Stratton-related conversations with Redmont law enforcement.

Additional statements in that evidence (entered as D-007-03) imply that ibney0 received information from Redmont directly about pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO. The defense moves the Court to compel ibney0 to produce their Stratton-related communications with Redmont law enforcement.

The defense moves the Court to compel ibney0 to enter a version of D-007 that includes images which are missing from this archive copy. (an example is entered as D-007-04) In particular, images of necessary context from third-party conversations which were shared between the parties as evidence are seemingly completely missing from the evidence.

Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77
Defendants

RESPONSE TO INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE, ENTREATY TO COMPEL

Your honour,

To begin, the Crown has no objection to the submission of the Crown's statement as D-007 if the defense so requests it.

Opposing counsel asserts D-007-1 and D-007-2 imply the existence of a deal in Redmont between these two witnesses. The Crown believes the Court has no jurisdiction to order the production of those materials from Redmont itself, but if they are in the possession of pricelessAgrari or FTLCEO, those two would be responsible for their production. Additionally, the Crown provides to the Court an affirmation that they are aware of no deals at this time within the Commonwealth of Redmont, and that FTLCEO submitted an anonymous tip to Redmont officials which he confused in these photos. The sections requested regarding discussion with Redmont officials regarding this issue are part of a classified channel and have been provided to the Court for in camera review. The Crown does not believe at this time the portions hold any information which requires a the closure of this case to the public, and does not object to the declassification of those particular messages. The only reason they have not been provided to the defense openly in Court at this time is due to their classified status, and we would join the defense in requesting they be allowed into the public record. We believe this assertion complies with the defenses second request.

The Crown does not have access to the images provided in D-007 which the defense is requesting. We believe that one of the images submitted to the Court for in camera review is one of the images discussed within that exhibit, but are not sure which one. The Crown was not aware of the tendency for evidence to disappear so quickly with these transcript features, and the Crown thinks that is a major design flaw of the system. In the future the Crown intends to seek different ways of preserving evidence.

Finally, in response to the defenses request for a different version of the transcript ticket for P-015, the Crown will provide individual pictures to both defense attorneys when they can later tonight.

Respectfully submitted,

Joseph Ibney0
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria