Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apologies your honour, it appears I missed one during the amendments. It has been resolved at this time. FTLCEO may still be referenced in the indictment due to his relevance to the case, but he is no longer listed as a defendant.The Court would like to remind the Prosecution (@Ibney0) to remove 12700k from all filings regarding this case, as he is no longer charged as per the agreement between the Prosecution and the Defendant.
Noted, thank you.Apologies your honour, it appears I missed one during the amendments. It has been resolved at this time. FTLCEO may still be referenced in the indictment due to his relevance to the case, but he is no longer listed as a defendant.
Given the rulings set out earlier in this case and in PhilinDeBlanc v. The Crown for the amendment of Discovery based on extensions to an Entreaty to Compel, the Court grants the Defendant's Entreaty of Continuance. Discovery shall end on the 2nd of July 2025, 6.40pm UTC.IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants
ENTREATY FOR CONTINUANCE
The Defense still needs an answer on the above requests and expects to need to adapt strategy based on the evidence after it is available. Defendants Maelzarun and Mr_GrapeJelly request an additional 48 hours of discovery to review.
Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria
drive.google.com
(Defense apologizes for misspelling pricelessAgrari's name as "princessAgrari" for the fourth time. pricelessAgrari is the one who is meant.)IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77
Defendants
ENTREATY TO COMPEL
Defense entreats Court to compel princessAgrari for logs between princessAgrari and the Redmont DOJ about Stratton. (including the report described in P-015) These logs must contain dates.
Defense entreats Court to compel FTLCEO to produce logs of his own communications with the Redmont DOJ about Stratton, including his own original complaint. These logs must contain dates.
Defense entreats Court to compel princessAgrari and Talion77 to produce logs between the two discussing (1) complaints made to Redmont or Alexandrian law enforcement (2) offers made by Redmont or Alexandrian law enforcement (3) the hiring of FTLCEO as a paralegal (4) the formation of AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS. Logs must include date information.
Defense requests continuance until 48 hours after requests have been complied with, for the same reasons as before.
ENTREATY FOR PERMISSION TO REVISE PREVIOUS MESSAGES
Defense entreats the Court for permission to remove FTLCEO from the Defendants list of previous filings by this Counsel, as is his wish.
(Other edits will not be made.)
Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria
The Court acknowledges the evidence submitted by the Defendant.IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77
Defendants
ENTREATY TO INTRODUCE EVIDENCE
The Defense would like to introduce:
D-014: Direct messages between ibney0 and FTLCEO.
D-015: Direct messages between ibney0 and pricelessAgrari.
D-016: Direct messages between ibney0 and Talion77.
D-017: Evidence that pricelessAgrari is a Redmont Police Officer.
Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria
Given that the Prosecution has produced the required material and a specific set of them are currently up for an in camera review by the Court, the Court grants the Entreaty of Continuance and therefore extends Discovery to 3rd July 2025, 4.00pm UTC.IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, FTLCEO, Talion77
Defendants
ENTREATY TO COMPEL
Having now had time to review D-007 fully, Defense entreats the court to compel ibney0 to produce full evidence and chain of custody, in the form of logs containing usernames of sources, for the production of the following evidence:
- P-023.
- P-025. (D-007 page 28 implies this is from FTLCEO; but FTLCEO appears to have submitted PDF files and there are none in the dump?)
- All images of P-004. (from both sources)
Defense entreats the court to compel ibney0, to the extent possible given his access, to produce all additional Stratton-relevant communications between Crown and members of the law firm representing defendant Emmet, including but not limited to:
- pricelessAgrari (see P-012-2)
- FTLCEO (see D-007 and entry #39)
- KingBOB99878 (see P-023/#ticket-0001)
- Talion77 (see entry #45)
- other MOJ and DOJ agents within AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS not yet named by the Defense (see entry #60 in this case)
This includes communications from before AGRARI, TALION, & PARTNERS was incorporated as a law firm; we specifically request communication regarding such establishment, if any.
If the Crown believes it has access to other communications substantially similar to the ones requested -- for instance, communications between listed parties and the Redmont Department of Justice that ibney0 has been given access to -- that would save time. (see entry #20)
With apologies to the court for the ongoing delay, the defense additionally entreaties for further continuance of discovery until at least 48 hours after complete and sufficient disclosures by the Crown on this matter, so the Defense can identify what other questions it apparently needs to ask.
RESPONSE TO ENTREATY TO DISMISSIN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77
Defendants
ENTREATY TO DISMISS
AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS is defending Defendants Emmet, Talion77, and Stratton LLC.
In response to discovery requests, the Crown has forthrightly produced logs of three interactions between Crown and staff members, or named partners, of AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS ("AGRARI"). In literally all cases, AGRARI representatives offered the Crown testimony against their clients in exchange for non-prosecution deals. (P-015, D-016 June 24, D-007)
MJ43, counsel of record in this case for Stratton, Emmet, and Talion77, is another AGRARI staff member. The Crown asserts that interactions with MJ43 exist but, pursuant to privilege, has not produced them. However, Talion77 claims his lawyer -- presumably MJ43 (D-011) -- told him to testify against Stratton defendants. (D-016 June 30).
It is likely ibney0 knew about the conflict of interest because Talion77 told him about it. (D-016 June 24) ibney0 reassured him that "thats fine" (D-016 June 24) and circled back six days later to re-offer the deal. (D-016 June 30).
AGRARI's misconduct is damaging to Defendants Mr_GrapeJelly and Maelzarun ("PD Defendants") because these are conspiracy charges with identical facts.
This counsel originally chose not to file an Entreaty of Severance based on the assumption that AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS would take a "no conspiracy" line consistent with their initial entreaties to dismiss, but we now believe they intend to tank the case, and that would directly implicate PD Defendants.
Defense entreats the Court to dismiss all charges with prejudice.
Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria
(from entry #55)Statements in that evidence (entered as D-007-01 and D-007-02) imply the existence of communications between pricelessAgrari, FTLCEO, and Redmont law enforcement about an earlier deal that was structurally similar to the deal they made with the Crown. The defense moves the Court to compel pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO to produce a record of their Stratton-related conversations with Redmont law enforcement.
Thank you for the reminder, the Court must've overlooked the Entreaty and will rule on it (as well as the Defendant's recent Entreaty to Dismiss) shortly.IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77
Defendants
RESPONSE TO INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE, ENTREATY TO COMPEL
Your honour,
To begin, the Crown has no objection to the submission of the Crown's statement as D-007 if the defense so requests it.
Opposing counsel asserts D-007-1 and D-007-2 imply the existence of a deal in Redmont between these two witnesses. The Crown believes the Court has no jurisdiction to order the production of those materials from Redmont itself, but if they are in the possession of pricelessAgrari or FTLCEO, those two would be responsible for their production. Additionally, the Crown provides to the Court an affirmation that they are aware of no deals at this time within the Commonwealth of Redmont, and that FTLCEO submitted an anonymous tip to Redmont officials which he confused in these photos. The sections requested regarding discussion with Redmont officials regarding this issue are part of a classified channel and have been provided to the Court for in camera review. The Crown does not believe at this time the portions hold any information which requires a the closure of this case to the public, and does not object to the declassification of those particular messages. The only reason they have not been provided to the defense openly in Court at this time is due to their classified status, and we would join the defense in requesting they be allowed into the public record. We believe this assertion complies with the defenses second request.
The Crown does not have access to the images provided in D-007 which the defense is requesting. We believe that one of the images submitted to the Court for in camera review is one of the images discussed within that exhibit, but are not sure which one. The Crown was not aware of the tendency for evidence to disappear so quickly with these transcript features, and the Crown thinks that is a major design flaw of the system. In the future the Crown intends to seek different ways of preserving evidence.
Finally, in response to the defenses request for a different version of the transcript ticket for P-015, the Crown will provide individual pictures to both defense attorneys when they can later tonight.
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph Ibney0
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIAIN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Crown
Prosecution
v.
Stratton LLC, Emmet99, Maelzarun, Mr_GrapeJelly, Talion77
Defendants
NOTE: Evidence is hard to read because it is HTML files in PDF files. Defense has excerpted it and has reuploaded P-015 here because it is not in the Prosecution's evidence folder.
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO ENTREATY TO DISMISS
AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS SCHEMED TO DEFRAUD EMMET AND STRATTON LLC
Before June 6th, pricelessAgrari and FTLCEO furnished the Redmont Department of Justice with confidential information about Stratton to attempt to induce a criminal investigation against Emmet and Stratton LLC. (P-015, page 13; D-007, page 2, 3)
They and Talion77 founded AGRARI, TALION & PARTNERS LLC ("AGRARI") specifically to "defend" Emmet and Stratton LLC from the consequences they anticipated from the investigation they provoked, as well as a new Alexandrian law that had been written specifically to target their client. As they had intended, they were immediately retained as counsel. (D-011)
The law passed, halting Stratton's business. After Stratton had already stopped all conduct enjoined by the law, pricelessAgrari contacted ibney0, the law's author and prosecutor in this case, with screenshots of their clients' privileged discussions about how to handle the new legislation -- casting that discussion as, itself, criminal. (P-015, pages 15, 16, 17, 31)
ibney0 agreed that those were crimes and filed this case, naming other members of Stratton and Emmet's defense team as defendants.
Afraid of being fined, AGRARI's other staff then rushed to ibney0 for non-prosecution deals. The Crown took advantage of this, securing server logs from paralegal FTLCEO (D-007, June 22nd) and an agreement to testify from named partner Talion77. (D-016, June 30th)
WHEN COUNSEL SCHEMES WITH THE PROSECUTION TO UNDERMINE THEIR OWN CLIENT, THE CLIENT HAS NO REAL LEGAL REPRESENTATION
Crown takes the stance that no conflict of interest existed, and if it did, the Crown didn't know about it, and if the Crown did know about it, it wasn't material, and if it was, that's no big deal, because conflicts of interest are allowed as long as they're not unfairly prejudicial.
Crown additionally asserts that Defendants are not inherently barred from testifying against other Defendants, but might be if the testimony is unfairly prejudicial.
These statements are unresponsive. The issue has nothing to do with prejudice or defendants' rights to testify against each other, and indeed ibney0 can flip defendants against each other all he wants so long as he is only working with defendants. The issue is that these are Emmet's counsel, who had flipped on him weeks before the trial.
When counsel conspires to sabotage their client's defense behind their client's back, that client is completely unrepresented. Normally, an unrepresented defendant would hire a lawyer or request a public defender, but in this case, the defendant did not know that they were unrepresented. AGRARI, purporting to provide legal representation for some of the defendants in this case, instead provided additional services to the prosecution without disclosing this role or extricating themselves from their duty to faithfully represent Stratton and Emmet.
AGRARI's June 11th statement (in entry #15 in this case) that they are representing Stratton is thus false, and senior officers of AGRARI knew it was false at the time their agent, MJ43, made that statement. Crown cannot argue that it did not know pricelessAgrari and Talion77 were staff of AGRARI, TALION, & PARTNERS LLC because the firm is named after them. Additionally, Talion77 directly discussed this with Prosecutor Ibney0 (D-016, June 24).
THE CASE IS UNFAIR AND SHOULD BE DISMISSED
Prosecutor Ibney0, representing the Crown, knew of AGRARI's conflict of interest and chose to benefit from it, keeping this information from the Court and from all defendants -- including defendants who had no genuine counsel and from the Public Defender -- until compelled during discovery. This fundamentally violates the Criminal Code and Procedure Act, part 14(1), by denying defendants Stratton and Emmet their right to legal representation at "all critical stages of the legal process" (emphasis added).
Stratton was unrepresented during subpoena, discovery, and questioning. These critical information-disclosure stages of the judicial process cannot be reversed; this bell cannot be un-rung. It is impossible for any defendant in the Stratton affair to effectively defend themselves against these charges after these critical stages have been tainted by the prosecution's knowing complicity in AGRARI's deliberate, overt acts to deprive their purported clients of their rights to representation.
Since no fair trial can be held on these matters due to the Crown's prosecutor's ratification of AGRARI's misconduct, this matter must be dismissed with prejudice with respect to all defendants. The Public Defender so entreats the court.
Nyeogmi Choi
Director, Public Defense
Kingdom of Alexandria
Thank you for the reminder, the Court must've overlooked the Entreaty and will rule on it (as well as the Defendant's recent Entreaty to Dismiss) shortly.
