Lawsuit: In Session The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

[AmityBlamity]

ENTREATY FOR CLARIFICATION ON EVIDENCE DELIVERY

---

​

Your Honor,

Defendant is working to comply with this Court's Order regarding the production of Thritystone's communications within the ANP Discord. However, the volume of materials is substantial, potentially exceeding 400 images.

Defendant will do its best to comply within the time allotted, but respectfully requests clarification on the method of delivery.

Rather than uploading several hundred images directly to the forum thread, would the Court permit the Defense to submit an archive file (e.g., .zip) containing the materials? This would preserve the evidence while avoiding an unwieldy thread.

Defendant is not seeking to delay production, only to clarify the appropriate format.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

A .zip archive file is indeed permissable.

 

[Nim]

ENTREATY TO COMPEL

---

​

Defendant Thritystone, pursuant to the Discovery Rules, requests the Crown produce the following:

1. The complete conversation from which P-001 was excerpted. Any messages before or after the screenshot provided.
2. WonderRuby's complete statement or report to ConsequencesInc (P-002 in full, unexcerpted).
3. Any communications between WonderRuby and the Crown, Ministry of Justice, or any government official regarding this matter, including any offers, agreements, or inducements for cooperation.
4. Any exculpatory evidence in the Crown's possession that tends to show innocence or undermine the charges.
5. Witness statements or summaries of expected testimony from WonderRuby and ConsequencesInc.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

 

[AmityBlamity]

ENTREATY TO COMPEL

---

​

Defendant Thritystone, pursuant to the Discovery Rules, requests the Crown produce the following:

1. The complete conversation from which P-001 was excerpted. Any messages before or after the screenshot provided.
2. WonderRuby's complete statement or report to ConsequencesInc (P-002 in full, unexcerpted).
3. Any communications between WonderRuby and the Crown, Ministry of Justice, or any government official regarding this matter, including any offers, agreements, or inducements for cooperation.
4. Any exculpatory evidence in the Crown's possession that tends to show innocence or undermine the charges.
5. Witness statements or summaries of expected testimony from WonderRuby and ConsequencesInc.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

The Crown has 24 hours to respond to this Entreaty.

@ColonelKai

 

[Nim]

ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE

---

​

Your Honor,

Defendant respectfully requests an extension of the discovery period.

Reasons:

1. The volume of materials required under this Court's warrant order is substantial.
2. Defendant is working diligently to compile these materials but requires additional time to do so properly and completely.

Request:

Defendant requests an extension of 48 hours from the current discovery deadline to complete production.

Defendant is not seeking to delay proceedings, only to ensure full and accurate compliance with this Court's orders.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

 

[AmityBlamity]

ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE

---

​

Your Honor,

Defendant respectfully requests an extension of the discovery period.

Reasons:

1. The volume of materials required under this Court's warrant order is substantial.
2. Defendant is working diligently to compile these materials but requires additional time to do so properly and completely.

Request:

Defendant requests an extension of 48 hours from the current discovery deadline to complete production.

Defendant is not seeking to delay proceedings, only to ensure full and accurate compliance with this Court's orders.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

Granted.

 

[Capt11543]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY

Your Honor, the Crown submits the following evidence to the Court in this case:

• P-007 (attached text file) - a transcript in which Defendant Thritystone appears to offer compensation to WonderRuby for voting for the ANP, in the amount of "about 500, bonus if we win". The transcript was obtained from WonderRuby.
• P-008 (attached text file) - a transcript in which Defendant Thritystone appears to agree to pay WonderRuby "1000. If I win" for "added encouragement". Defendant also appears to ask how to "get proof of vote" from WonderRuby.
• P-009 - Correspondence between WonderRuby and Minister of Justice SoggehToast.

Spoiler: P-009

Respectfully submitted,
Capt11543
Crown Counsel

 

[Capt11543]

ENTREATY TO COMPEL

---

​

Defendant Thritystone, pursuant to the Discovery Rules, requests the Crown produce the following:

1. The complete conversation from which P-001 was excerpted. Any messages before or after the screenshot provided.
2. WonderRuby's complete statement or report to ConsequencesInc (P-002 in full, unexcerpted).
3. Any communications between WonderRuby and the Crown, Ministry of Justice, or any government official regarding this matter, including any offers, agreements, or inducements for cooperation.
4. Any exculpatory evidence in the Crown's possession that tends to show innocence or undermine the charges.
5. Witness statements or summaries of expected testimony from WonderRuby and ConsequencesInc.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO ENTREATY TO COMPEL

1. The Crown believes P-007 and P-008 satisfy this request.
2. To the best of the Crown's current knowledge, P-002 represents the complete conversation between WonderRuby and ConsequencesInc.
3. The Crown believes P-009 satisfies this request.
4. The Crown submits the following evidence in response to this request:
   • P-010 - A job posting within the Alexandria National Party Discord server seeking campaign staffers for the ANP, offering "100 per MP elected" as compensation.
   • P-011 - An agenda item from the Alexandria National Party Convention to allocate £4000 to campaign expenses, including payroll for campaign staffers.
   • P-012 - Correspondence between Defendant Thritystone and Uncharged Individual B, where B agrees to an offer of employment as an Alexandria National Party campaign staffer.
5. The Crown intends to seek additional time to prepare this.

Spoiler: P-010

Spoiler: P-011

Spoiler: P-012

Respectfully submitted,
Capt11543
Crown Counsel

 

[Nim]

DEFENDANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH WARRANT ORDER

---

​

Your Honor,

Pursuant to this Court's Order dated January 25, 2026, Defendant Thritystone produces the following:

Spoiler: D-001 | Warrant Compliance - Discord Communications & Financial Records

Proton Drive

Spoiler: D-002 | Legal Entities Owned or which Thritystone holds majority stake in

• Stoned Enterprise Corporation
• Priceline co (subsidiary of SEC)
• Alexandria National Party (ANP)
• Alexandrian Economics Institute (AEI)
• 30holdings
• Stonedbank
• GOGO Corporation
• Rentals Corporation
• SSS Corporation
• Spectrum Corporation
• SCC (State Craft Corporation)
• SC (State Craft Corporation)
• Stone Corporation

Withheld as attorney-client privileged:

• Private Members Chat
• Legal Channel

Section 2 (Communications discussing compensation for voting):
Defendant objects pursuant to Minecraft Cities Network Server Rules §2. Without waiving this objection, no responsive documents exist beyond those already in evidence.

---

​

Defendant has preserved all potential evidence as ordered.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

 

[SoggehToast]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO AMEND
SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY

Your Honor,

Throughout the course of this discovery and the Crown's parallel investigation, new evidence has emerged that we find necessitates an amendment to the initial criminal action filing to include charges against Defendant 12700k, as well as additional conspiracy charges against both Defendants. Accordingly, the Crown requests to amend the initial criminal action filing (#1) in the following manner:

I. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Defendant Thritystone conspired to manipulate the results of the January 2026 General Election by offering money to citizens in exchange for a vote for their political party. Thritystone directly offered at least one individual compensation as part of this scheme.
Defendants Thritystone and 12700k attempted to manipulate the results of the January 2026 General Election by offering money to citizens and campaign staff in exchange for voting for the Alexandria National Party.

II. PARTIES

1. The Crown, represented by the Ministry of Justice​

2. Thritystone​

3. 12700k​

III. FACTS
(Time zones are in UTC unless otherwise indicated)

1. The January 2026 General Election began at the dissolution of Parliament on January 15, 2026. The polls opened on January 20, 2026. See Parliament Elections | January 2026 (Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2026).​

2. On or before January 19, 2026, Defendant Thritystone corresponded with WonderRuby. See P-001.​

3. As a result of this correspondence, WonderRuby was offered at least £250 in exchange for voting for the Alexandria National Party. See P-001, P-002​

4. /treasury command records show that WonderRuby received £250 on January 19, 2026 at 3:36 AM from the /pay command. See P-003.​

5. /treasury command records show that Thritystone paid £250 on January 19, 2026 at 3:36 AM from the /pay command. See P-003.​

6. WonderRuby later shared details of their correspondence with Thritystone with Rt. Hon. Internal Minister ConsequencesInc. See P-002.​

7. On January 22, 2026, WonderRuby additionally claimed to have voted for the Alexandria National Party in the election. See P-004.​

8. Thritystone is a candidate on the Alexandria National Party's party list in the election. See Parliament Elections | January 2026 (Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2026).​

1. On January 3, 2026, Thritystone proposed an agenda item on the Alexandria National Party Discord server establishing a campaign budget, including funds allocated for the hiring of campaign staffers. See P-011.​

2. On January 11, 2026, Thritystone announced a program on the Alexandria National Party Discord server to hire campaign staffers, stating that staffers would receive compensation contingent on the number of Alexandria National Party members elected to Parliament. See P-010.​

3. On January 11, 2026, Thritystone engaged in direct communications with at least one individual regarding participation in the campaign staffing program described above. See P-012.​

4. The January 2026 General Election began at the dissolution of Parliament on January 15, 2026. The polls opened on January 20, 2026. See Parliament Elections | January 2026 (Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2026).​

5. Thritystone is a candidate on the Alexandria National Party’s party list in the January 2026 General Election. See Parliament Elections | January 2026 (Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2026).​

6. On January 19, 2026, Defendant Thritystone corresponded with WonderRuby. As a result of this correspondence, WonderRuby was offered at least £500 in exchange for voting for the Alexandria National Party, plus a £500 bonus conditioned on the Alexandria National Party winning the election. See P-007, P-008.​

7. On January 21, 2026, WonderRuby indicated in a message that they had voted for Thritystone. See P-004.​

8. On January 21, 2026, Defendant 12700k directly contacted a player and requested that they vote for the Alexandria National Party. After the player declined, 12700k offered to provide payment in exchange for the player’s vote. See P-005, P-006, P-014, P-015, P-016.​

9. On January 21, 2026, 12700k made statements regarding his paid campaign staff associated with the Alexandria National Party and the difficulty those staff experienced voting for the Alexandria National Party in the election due to the citizenship exam requirement. See P-017.​

IV. ARGUMENT
By persuading WonderRuby to commit the immoral act of participating in election manipulation in exchange for compensation, Defendant Thritystone has committed Bribery. See A.P. 01-006 §21(3)(b):
1. The Defendant orchestrated a coordinated scheme to influence the January 2026 General Election by offering money in exchange for votes. Both Defendants offered direct financial compensation to individuals conditioned on their voting for the Alexandria National Party. Their conduct represented a unified effort to alter the outcome of the January 2026 General Election and constitutes conspiracy to commit Bribery under A.P. 01-006 §21(3)(b):

Bribery - A player is guilty of bribery if they persuade someone to commit an illegal or immoral act in exchange for a benefit.

2. By engaging in Bribery--an illegal act--to manipulate the outcome of the January 2026 General Election, Defendant Thritystone the Defendants have committed conspired to commit Election Fraud. See id. at §20(6)(d):

Electoral Fraud - A player is guilty of electoral fraud if they intentionally and illegally alter the outcome of any Alexandrian election as prescribed by law.

3. In addition to the conspiracy described above, Defendant Thritystone directly offered monetary compensation to WonderRuby in exchange for voting for the Alexandria National Party. This conduct independently constitutes bribery and attempted election fraud. See CCPA §20(6)(d) and §21(3)(b).

4. Defendant 12700k likewise directly offered monetary compensation to at least one player in exchange for voting for the Alexandria National Party. This conduct independently constitutes bribery and attempted election fraud. See CCPA §20(6)(d) and §21(3)(b).

V. CHARGES
All Defendants

​

1. Conspiracy to violate CCPA Sec. 21(3)(b) - Bribery​

2. Conspiracy to violate CCPA Sec. 20(6)(d) - Election Fraud​

Defendant Thritystone:

• 1 count of Bribery
• 1 count of Election Fraud

1. One violation of CCPA Sec. 21(3)(b) - Bribery​

2. Attempt to violate CCPA Sec. 20(6)(d) - Election Fraud​

Defendant 12700k

1. One violation of CCPA Sec. 21(3)(b) - Bribery​

2. Attempt to violate CCPA Sec. 20(6)(d) - Election Fraud​

​

The Crown additionally submits the following evidence to the Court in support of this amendment:

Spoiler: P-013

Spoiler: P-014

Spoiler: P-015

Spoiler: P-016

Spoiler: P-017

Spoiler: P-018

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
MInister of Justice
KIngdom of Alexandria

 

[Capt11543]

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO SUMMON

Your Honor,

Should the Crown's outstanding Entreaty to Amend be accepted, the Crown also beseeches this Court to summon @12700k as a defendant in this case.

Respectfully submitted,
Capt11543
Crown Counsel

 

[Nim]

ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL

Failure to Include Party

---

​

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Thritystone moves to dismiss this case pursuant to the General Court Rules and Procedures on grounds of Failure to Include Party.

The Crown's own filings prove that from the very first day of this case, it believed multiple individuals were engaged in a conspiracy. The Crown possessed evidence of 12700k's involvement on January 22, 2026. It referenced this evidence in its warrant application. It explicitly stated it believed "multiple individuals within the Alexandria National Party have entered into a conspiracy."

Yet the Crown chose to charge only Thritystone.

Having deliberately excluded a necessary party—a co-conspirator whose conduct the Crown now claims is central to this case—the Crown's complaint is fatally defective. The case must be dismissed.

---

​

II. LEGAL STANDARD

The General Court Rules and Procedures establish Failure to Include Party as a ground for dismissal:

Grounds for Dismissal:

• Failure to Include Party

This ground must be raised before opening statements. See id. Opening statements have not yet occurred.

---

​

III. FACTS

A. The Crown Knew About 12700k on January 22, 2026

1. On January 22, 2026, the Crown filed its Criminal Complaint charging only Thritystone. See The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026) #1.
2. On the same day, the Crown filed an Entreaty for Warrant to Search. See The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026) #2.
3. In that warrant application, the Crown stated:

"On January 22, 2026, the Crown received a report via a Ministry of Justice ticket from emilypancakes22, documenting correspondence with an un-charged, alleged co-conspirator."

See id. at §I(1) (emphasis added).

1. The Crown submitted P-005 and P-006—evidence directly concerning 12700k's alleged conduct—as part of that filing.
2. The Crown explicitly argued:

"The Crown thus believes that there is probable cause to suspect that multiple individuals within the Alexandria National Party have entered into a conspiracy to offer compensation to others in exchange for votes for the Alexandria National Party. This would constitute Conspiracy to Commit Bribery and Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud."

See id. at §II(5) (emphasis added).

B. The Crown Used 12700k's Evidence While Excluding Him

The Crown's warrant application relied on evidence of 12700k's conduct (P-005, P-006) to establish probable cause for a conspiracy. The Crown told this Court that "multiple individuals" were involved in a conspiracy. The Crown obtained a warrant based partly on this representation.

Yet the Crown deliberately excluded 12700k from the case.

C. Eight Days Later, the Crown Seeks to Add 12700k

On January 30, 2026—after discovery has closed, after the Defendant has pleaded, after the Defense has prepared its case—the Crown now seeks to add 12700k as a defendant and add conspiracy charges. See The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026) #30.

---

​

IV. ARGUMENT

A. 12700k Is a Necessary Party to the Crown's Conspiracy Theory

The Crown's own theory of the case requires 12700k's inclusion:

1. Conspiracy requires co-conspirators. Under A.P. 01-006 §19(3), conspiracy requires that "multiple players have the specific intent to commit a crime, agree to commit that crime, and at least one of them takes an overt act in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy."
2. The Crown alleged conspiracy from Day 1. The Crown's warrant application explicitly argued there was a conspiracy involving "multiple individuals."
3. You cannot have a one-person conspiracy. If the Crown's theory is that Thritystone conspired with others to commit bribery and electoral fraud, those others are necessary parties.
4. 12700k is the identified co-conspirator. The Crown's evidence (P-005, P-006, and now P-013 through P-018) identifies 12700k as the co-conspirator.

By the Crown's own admission, this case involves a conspiracy. 12700k is a necessary party to that conspiracy. The Crown failed to include him.

B. The Crown Deliberately Excluded 12700k

This is not a case of newly discovered evidence. The Crown:

• Had P-005 and P-006 on January 22, 2026
• Cited this evidence in its warrant application
• Explicitly argued there was a conspiracy involving "multiple individuals"
• Chose to charge only Thritystone

The Crown made a deliberate tactical decision to exclude 12700k. It cannot now cure this defect by amendment.

C. There Is No Evidence of Any Conspiracy

Even setting aside the procedural defect, the Crown's conspiracy theory fails on its merits. The Crown has produced no evidence that Thritystone and 12700k ever agreed to anything.

Under A.P. 01-006 §19(3), conspiracy requires:

1. Multiple players with specific intent to commit a crime
2. An agreement to commit that crime
3. An overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy

The Crown has shown:

• Thritystone allegedly offered payment to WonderRuby
• 12700k allegedly offered payment to emilypancakes22

These are two separate, independent actions by two different people directed at two different individuals. The Crown has produced:

• No communications between Thritystone and 12700k discussing any scheme
• No evidence of any agreement between them
• No coordinated plan - merely two people who happen to be in the same political party allegedly doing similar things

Two people independently engaging in similar conduct is not a conspiracy. A conspiracy requires an agreement. The Crown has not produced a single piece of evidence showing Thritystone and 12700k ever agreed to do anything together.

The Crown cannot manufacture a conspiracy out of thin air simply because two ANP members allegedly engaged in similar conduct. By that logic, any two members of any organization who independently commit similar acts would be "conspirators."

D. The Underlying Acts Are Not Illegal

The conspiracy theory fails for an additional reason: the underlying acts are not crimes.

As set forth in the Defense's Answer to Criminal Complaint, voting for a political party is not an "illegal or immoral act" under A.P. 01-006 §21(3)(b). Voting is a constitutional right guaranteed by K.A. Const. § V Art. 22(2).

One cannot "conspire" to commit bribery when the alleged bribery does not meet the statutory definition. The alleged "immoral act"—voting for ANP—is a lawful exercise of a constitutional right.

E. The Defect Is Fatal

The Crown built its case on a theory of conspiracy while:

1. Deliberately excluding the alleged co-conspirator
2. Producing no evidence of any agreement
3. Alleging a conspiracy to commit an act that is not illegal

---

​

V. CONCLUSION

The Crown knew about 12700k on January 22, 2026. It possessed evidence of his alleged conduct. It argued to this Court that "multiple individuals" were engaged in a conspiracy. It obtained a search warrant based partly on this representation.

Yet the Crown deliberately chose to exclude 12700k from this case.

Moreover, the Crown has produced no evidence of any conspiracy. Two people independently engaging in similar conduct is not a conspiracy. An agreement is required, and no such agreement has been shown.

Finally, even if there were an agreement, the underlying acts—encouraging people to vote—are not illegal or immoral. One cannot conspire to commit a crime that does not exist.

WHEREFORE, Defendant Thritystone respectfully requests that this Court:

1. DISMISS this case on grounds of Failure to Include Party; or
2. In the alternative, DISMISS all conspiracy-related charges and theories, and DENY the Crown's Entreaty to Amend; or
3. In the further alternative, DENY the Crown's Entreaty to Amend in full.

---

​

Respectfully submitted,

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

January 30, 2026

 

[AmityBlamity]

ENTREATY OF DISMISSAL

Failure to Include Party

---

​

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Thritystone moves to dismiss this case pursuant to the General Court Rules and Procedures on grounds of Failure to Include Party.

The Crown's own filings prove that from the very first day of this case, it believed multiple individuals were engaged in a conspiracy. The Crown possessed evidence of 12700k's involvement on January 22, 2026. It referenced this evidence in its warrant application. It explicitly stated it believed "multiple individuals within the Alexandria National Party have entered into a conspiracy."

Yet the Crown chose to charge only Thritystone.

Having deliberately excluded a necessary party—a co-conspirator whose conduct the Crown now claims is central to this case—the Crown's complaint is fatally defective. The case must be dismissed.

---

​

II. LEGAL STANDARD

The General Court Rules and Procedures establish Failure to Include Party as a ground for dismissal:

Grounds for Dismissal:

• Failure to Include Party

This ground must be raised before opening statements. See id. Opening statements have not yet occurred.

---

​

III. FACTS

A. The Crown Knew About 12700k on January 22, 2026

1. On January 22, 2026, the Crown filed its Criminal Complaint charging only Thritystone. See The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026) #1.
2. On the same day, the Crown filed an Entreaty for Warrant to Search. See The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026) #2.
3. In that warrant application, the Crown stated:

"On January 22, 2026, the Crown received a report via a Ministry of Justice ticket from emilypancakes22, documenting correspondence with an un-charged, alleged co-conspirator."

See id. at §I(1) (emphasis added).

1. The Crown submitted P-005 and P-006—evidence directly concerning 12700k's alleged conduct—as part of that filing.
2. The Crown explicitly argued:

"The Crown thus believes that there is probable cause to suspect that multiple individuals within the Alexandria National Party have entered into a conspiracy to offer compensation to others in exchange for votes for the Alexandria National Party. This would constitute Conspiracy to Commit Bribery and Conspiracy to Commit Election Fraud."

See id. at §II(5) (emphasis added).

B. The Crown Used 12700k's Evidence While Excluding Him

The Crown's warrant application relied on evidence of 12700k's conduct (P-005, P-006) to establish probable cause for a conspiracy. The Crown told this Court that "multiple individuals" were involved in a conspiracy. The Crown obtained a warrant based partly on this representation.

Yet the Crown deliberately excluded 12700k from the case.

C. Eight Days Later, the Crown Seeks to Add 12700k

On January 30, 2026—after discovery has closed, after the Defendant has pleaded, after the Defense has prepared its case—the Crown now seeks to add 12700k as a defendant and add conspiracy charges. See The Crown v. Thritystone, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026) #30.

---

​

IV. ARGUMENT

A. 12700k Is a Necessary Party to the Crown's Conspiracy Theory

The Crown's own theory of the case requires 12700k's inclusion:

1. Conspiracy requires co-conspirators. Under A.P. 01-006 §19(3), conspiracy requires that "multiple players have the specific intent to commit a crime, agree to commit that crime, and at least one of them takes an overt act in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy."
2. The Crown alleged conspiracy from Day 1. The Crown's warrant application explicitly argued there was a conspiracy involving "multiple individuals."
3. You cannot have a one-person conspiracy. If the Crown's theory is that Thritystone conspired with others to commit bribery and electoral fraud, those others are necessary parties.
4. 12700k is the identified co-conspirator. The Crown's evidence (P-005, P-006, and now P-013 through P-018) identifies 12700k as the co-conspirator.

By the Crown's own admission, this case involves a conspiracy. 12700k is a necessary party to that conspiracy. The Crown failed to include him.

B. The Crown Deliberately Excluded 12700k

This is not a case of newly discovered evidence. The Crown:

• Had P-005 and P-006 on January 22, 2026
• Cited this evidence in its warrant application
• Explicitly argued there was a conspiracy involving "multiple individuals"
• Chose to charge only Thritystone

The Crown made a deliberate tactical decision to exclude 12700k. It cannot now cure this defect by amendment.

C. There Is No Evidence of Any Conspiracy

Even setting aside the procedural defect, the Crown's conspiracy theory fails on its merits. The Crown has produced no evidence that Thritystone and 12700k ever agreed to anything.

Under A.P. 01-006 §19(3), conspiracy requires:

1. Multiple players with specific intent to commit a crime
2. An agreement to commit that crime
3. An overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy

The Crown has shown:

• Thritystone allegedly offered payment to WonderRuby
• 12700k allegedly offered payment to emilypancakes22

These are two separate, independent actions by two different people directed at two different individuals. The Crown has produced:

• No communications between Thritystone and 12700k discussing any scheme
• No evidence of any agreement between them
• No coordinated plan - merely two people who happen to be in the same political party allegedly doing similar things

Two people independently engaging in similar conduct is not a conspiracy. A conspiracy requires an agreement. The Crown has not produced a single piece of evidence showing Thritystone and 12700k ever agreed to do anything together.

The Crown cannot manufacture a conspiracy out of thin air simply because two ANP members allegedly engaged in similar conduct. By that logic, any two members of any organization who independently commit similar acts would be "conspirators."

D. The Underlying Acts Are Not Illegal

The conspiracy theory fails for an additional reason: the underlying acts are not crimes.

As set forth in the Defense's Answer to Criminal Complaint, voting for a political party is not an "illegal or immoral act" under A.P. 01-006 §21(3)(b). Voting is a constitutional right guaranteed by K.A. Const. § V Art. 22(2).

One cannot "conspire" to commit bribery when the alleged bribery does not meet the statutory definition. The alleged "immoral act"—voting for ANP—is a lawful exercise of a constitutional right.

E. The Defect Is Fatal

The Crown built its case on a theory of conspiracy while:

1. Deliberately excluding the alleged co-conspirator
2. Producing no evidence of any agreement
3. Alleging a conspiracy to commit an act that is not illegal

---

​

V. CONCLUSION

The Crown knew about 12700k on January 22, 2026. It possessed evidence of his alleged conduct. It argued to this Court that "multiple individuals" were engaged in a conspiracy. It obtained a search warrant based partly on this representation.

Yet the Crown deliberately chose to exclude 12700k from this case.

Moreover, the Crown has produced no evidence of any conspiracy. Two people independently engaging in similar conduct is not a conspiracy. An agreement is required, and no such agreement has been shown.

Finally, even if there were an agreement, the underlying acts—encouraging people to vote—are not illegal or immoral. One cannot conspire to commit a crime that does not exist.

WHEREFORE, Defendant Thritystone respectfully requests that this Court:

1. DISMISS this case on grounds of Failure to Include Party; or
2. In the alternative, DISMISS all conspiracy-related charges and theories, and DENY the Crown's Entreaty to Amend; or
3. In the further alternative, DENY the Crown's Entreaty to Amend in full.

---

​

Respectfully submitted,

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

January 30, 2026

The Entreaty of Dismissal is denied. Considering the Crown is amending their complaint to include the missing party, this entreaty has no standing. Nor will I dismiss all conspiracy-related charges. It is on the Crown to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a conspiracy took place.

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO AMEND
SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY

Your Honor,

Throughout the course of this discovery and the Crown's parallel investigation, new evidence has emerged that we find necessitates an amendment to the initial criminal action filing to include charges against Defendant 12700k, as well as additional conspiracy charges against both Defendants. Accordingly, the Crown requests to amend the initial criminal action filing (#1) in the following manner:

​

The Crown additionally submits the following evidence to the Court in support of this amendment:

Spoiler: P-013

View attachment 1217

Spoiler: P-014

View attachment 1218

Spoiler: P-015

View attachment 1219

Spoiler: P-016

View attachment 1220

Spoiler: P-017

View attachment 1221

Spoiler: P-018

View attachment 1222

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
MInister of Justice
KIngdom of Alexandria

Granted.

 

[AmityBlamity]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS
@12700k is required to appear before the Magistrates' Court In the case of
The Crown v. Thritystone & 12700k, Case 3 (Mag. Ct., 2026).

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons may result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

All parties will make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures (General and Magistrates).​

 

[AmityBlamity]

DEFENDANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH WARRANT ORDER

---

​

Your Honor,

Pursuant to this Court's Order dated January 25, 2026, Defendant Thritystone produces the following:

Spoiler: D-001 | Warrant Compliance - Discord Communications & Financial Records

Proton Drive

Spoiler: D-002 | Legal Entities Owned or which Thritystone holds majority stake in

• Stoned Enterprise Corporation
• Priceline co (subsidiary of SEC)
• Alexandria National Party (ANP)
• Alexandrian Economics Institute (AEI)
• 30holdings
• Stonedbank
• GOGO Corporation
• Rentals Corporation
• SSS Corporation
• Spectrum Corporation
• SCC (State Craft Corporation)
• SC (State Craft Corporation)
• Stone Corporation

Withheld as attorney-client privileged:

• Private Members Chat
• Legal Channel

Section 2 (Communications discussing compensation for voting):
Defendant objects pursuant to Minecraft Cities Network Server Rules §2. Without waiving this objection, no responsive documents exist beyond those already in evidence.

---

​

Defendant has preserved all potential evidence as ordered.

---

​

Nim

Counsel for Defendant Thritystone

Counselor @Nim, I have attempted to download the files provided on the Proton Drive, but have been met with numerous instances of an "invalid access token" error. Can you please explain to this court why this evidence is inaccessible?

 

[AmityBlamity]

Discovery is paused until such time 12700k has made themselves present and presented their plea.

 

[Nim]

Counselor @Nim, I have attempted to download the files provided on the Proton Drive, but have been met with numerous instances of an "invalid access token" error. Can you please explain to this court why this evidence is inaccessible?

View attachment 1230

Your Honor, I am able to download it on multiple devices on an incognito window, I believe the issue is on your side.

 

[12700k]

Present your honor. However, I am a bit confused on what I am meant to respond to as the original complaint is against Thritystone.

 

[12700k]

Oh, I see the original complaint has not been updated to reflect the amendments that were just proposed.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Present your honor. However, I am a bit confused on what I am meant to respond to as the original complaint is against Thritystone.

48 hours to present your Plea.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Your Honor, I am able to download it on multiple devices on an incognito window, I believe the issue is on your side.

It would appear so. My apologies. Proton Media is hereby found in Contempt.