Lawsuit: Pending Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

[ConsequencesInc]

IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
APPEAL AND CRIMINAL MATTER

Case No.: 6

BETWEEN:
Thritystone
Applicant/Defendant

v.

THE CROWN OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Respondent/Prosecution


I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT AND VENUE

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this suit pursuant to Part III, §14 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria which vests judicial power in the courts to interpret and administer the law.

2. The Magistrate Court is the proper venue for this suit as an appeal to a summary offense, pursuant to §9 (2) of the A.P. 4-019 | Criminal Procedure Act which grants this court jurisdiction over appeals to summary offenses.


II. Appeal Request

3. On April 8th, 2026 at around 12:50am CST, my client Thritystone was arrested by Peace Officer and Particular Individual PhillinDeBlanc and summarily charged with Murder and Evading Arrest, incurring a fine of £600 and a sentence of 28 minutes in jail.

4. Pursuant to §9 (2) and (3) of the A.P. 4-019 | Criminal Procedure Act, this filing before the honorable court constitutes my client's official notice off appeal, which we request be granted posthaste as the Criminal Procedure Act guarantees that my client shall receive a full trial before the court upon appeal, wherein the Crown as the Prosecution shall prove my client's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, or else these charges and punishment he has received will be reversed.

5. As part of my client's Right to a speedy and fair trial, and his right to be informed of nature of the charges against him as guaranteed by Part V, §22 (7) of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Alexandria, I request that the criminal trial for my client be held as a direct continuation of this proceeding after the Crown acknowledges receipt of this appeal when presenting themselves before the Court.

6. Furthermore, due to the Appeal turning into a Criminal Trial, I request that the Crown be required to bring its official Criminal Complaint against my client so that he may be officially informed of the nature of the charges against him and the defense may respond to the allegations at that time.

Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
4/8/2026


Proof of Representation of the Respondent/Defendant

Spoiler: Proof of Representation

 

[Dogeington]

The Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria accepts this appeal.

 

[Dogeington]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS


The Crown's rightfully appointed counsel is commanded to appear before the Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in

Case 6 (Mag Ct., 2026)
Thritystone
Applicant/Defendant

v.

The Crown
Respondent/Prosecution


They are hereby required to do so within seventy-two (72) hours. Failure to do so may result in a default judgment.

So ordered,
Magistrate Dogeington​

 

[SoggehToast]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS

Soggeh T. Oast for the Crown, Your Honor.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Dogeington]

@SoggehToast

You have 72 hours to present the Crown's case against Thritystone. Please present the case as if you were bringing a criminal action against Mr. Thritystone. We will proceed from there as if this were a criminal trial.

 

[SoggehToast]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA

CRIMINAL ACTION

The Crown
Prosecution

v.

Thritystone
Defendant​

I. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
On or about 7 April 2026, Thritystone unlawfully killed Capt11543. Ministry of Justice records and the server crime plugin maintain wanted records accessible to Constables. Upon reviewing those records, Constable PhillinDeBlanc, acting as arresting officer, moved to detain Thritystone on charges of murder. Before the arrest process could be completed, Thritystone escaped from his handcuffs and fled. He was subsequently tracked down and imprisoned.

II. PARTIES

1. The Crown
2. Thritystone

III. FACTS

1. Ministry of Justice records demonstrate that on or around April 7th, 2026, the Defendant unlawfully killed Capt11543.
2. This unlawful killing did not occur as a result of a consensual arrangement between the Defendant and the victim.
3. Ministry of Justice criminal records additionally reflect that Constable PhillinDeBlanc, the Defendant's arresting officer, submitted that he had a struggle with the Defendant, wherein the Defendant escaped from the the arresting officer's handcuffs and attempted to flee.
4. With the assistance of a helpful citizen, Constable PhillinDeBlanc was able to eventually detain, arrest, and imprison Thritystone.

IV. ARGUMENT

1. By getting a bit silly and unlawfully killing a player without their consent, Thritystone violated A.P. 04-020 §21(2), which provides:

(1) Murder - A player is guilty of murder if they intentionally and knowingly, or with extreme recklessness, kill another player without consent from that player.
(a) Offense Type: Summary
(b) Maximum Penalty: 4 Penalty Units fine + 30 minutes in jail

2. While PhillinDeBlanc was arresting the Defendant, the Defendant broke free of the handcuffs and attempted to flee, thereby violating A.P. 04-020 §10(13), which provides:

(13) Evading or Resisting Arrest - A player is guilty of evading or resisting arrest if they attempt to escape from a peace officer when that peace officer is at that moment attempting to legally arrest or detain them.
(a) Offense Type: Summary
(b) Maximum Penalty: 8 Penalty Units fine + 10 minutes in jail

V. CHARGES

Defendant Thritystone:
1. One violation of A.P. 04-020 §21(2) - Murder
2. One violation of A.P. 04-020 §10(13) - Evading or Resisting Arrest

VI. EVIDENCE:

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

VII. WITNESSES

1. Capt11543
2. PhillinDeBlanc

Respectfully Submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[Dogeington]

@ConsequencesInc

You have 48 hours to present a Plea before the court.

 

[SoggehToast]

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY TO AMEND

Your Honor,

It appears I myself got a bit silly and mistakenly cited an incorrect provision within my own Act. Murder is provided in A.P. 04-020 §7(1), not §21(2). The Crown respectfully requests permission to amend filing (#3) to address this mistake. Murder was defined in §21(2) of the now repealed CCPA, but is located elsewhere within the Criminal Code Act.

IV. ARGUMENT
1. By getting a bit silly and unlawfully killing a player without their consent, Thritystone violated A.P. 04-020 §21(2) §7(1), which provides:

(1) Murder - A player is guilty of murder if they intentionally and knowingly, or with extreme recklessness, kill another player without consent from that player.
(a) Offense Type: Summary
(b) Maximum Penalty: 4 Penalty Units fine + 30 minutes in jail

2. While PhillinDeBlanc was arresting the Defendant, the Defendant broke free of the handcuffs and attempted to flee, thereby violating A.P. 04-020 §10(13), which provides:

(13) Evading or Resisting Arrest - A player is guilty of evading or resisting arrest if they attempt to escape from a peace officer when that peace officer is at that moment attempting to legally arrest or detain them.
(a) Offense Type: Summary
(b) Maximum Penalty: 8 Penalty Units fine + 10 minutes in jail

V. CHARGES

Defendant Thritystone:
1. One violation of A.P. 04-020 §21(2) §7(1) - Murder
2. One violation of A.P. 04-020 §10(13) - Evading or Resisting Arrest

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria

 

[ConsequencesInc]

IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION

Case No.: 6

BETWEEN:
THE CROWN OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
Prosecution

v.

Thritystone
Defendant


I. Plea
The Defendant Thritystone pleads NOT GUILTY to the charges of Murder and Resisting Arrest.


II. Response to Facts
1. The Defense DENIES that Ministry of Justice records demonstrate that on or around April 7th, 2026, the Defendant unlawfully killed Capt11543.
2. The Defense:

• DENIES that this was an unlawful killing.
• NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES that it did not occur as a result of a consensual arrangement between the Defendant and the victim.

3. The Defense AFFFIRMS Ministry of Justice criminal records additionally reflect that PhillinDeBlanc, the Defendant's arresting officer, submitted that he had a struggle with the Defendant, wherein the Defendant escaped from the the arresting officer's handcuffs and attempted to flee.

4. The Defense AFFIRMS that with the assistance of a citizen, Constable PhillinDeBlanc was able to eventually detain, arrest, and imprison Thritystone.


III. DEFENSES


1. The Crown must prove it was Murder, and that it was beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Crown as a particular individual in this case has a burden, a large burden that is must prove by the law and with the law. It has to lay out before the Parental Adjudicator that is the Magistrate's Court that my client, Thritystone unlawfully killed Capt11543 and that it meets the legal definition of Murder. Note the emphasis on unlawfully. That means that the crown has several burdens to prove, including:

Reasonable Doubt, which as defined by §4(1)(a) of A.P.04-019 of the Criminal Procedure Act means "proof that precludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and would produce in a reasonable person’s mind a firm belief in the defendant's guilt"

AND that at the alleged Murder was done so either:

Knowingly and Intentionally, as per §3(3) and (4) of A.P.04-020 of the Criminal Code Act,

Or "extreme" recklessness, as per §3(2) of A.P.04-020 of the Criminal Code Act.

AND that the Defendant had mens rea and actus reus as per §2(3) of A.P.04-020 of the Criminal Code Act.

It is the Defense's position that while the Defendant might have killed someone, as reflected in Prosecution's Exhibit 2 (P-002), that doesn't tell the whole story and it isn't definitive proof of it being done "intentionally and knowingly" done, or being "extremely reckless", or proving a guilty mind or guilty act as per mens rea and actus reus respectively. There is room for doubt here, and the Defense intends to show there were likely other circumstances and factors at play that will show reason to reasonably doubt.

Additionally, the Crown for Resisting Arrest must also provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and mens rea and actus reus there as well.


2. PhillinDeBlanc did not properly identify himself as an active police officer, invalidating the Resisting Arrest Charge.
While the record and evidence does show that PhillinDeBlanc struggled when first attempting to aprehend the defendant, this is not the whole story.

§10(13) of A.P.04-020 the Criminal Code Act is clear: "A player is guilty of evading or resisting arrest if they attempt to escape from a peace officer when that peace officer is at that moment attempting to legally arrest or detain them". Please note Prosecution's Exhibit 1 (P-001) as it tells the clear story:

That the particular individual PhillinDeBlanc tazed, pepersprayed then cuffed my client. But never in that interaction does he identify himself as a Peace Officer, nor does he seem to attempt to do so. He simply attacks my client, orders him to Freeze, then attempts to arrest him for murder (and fails to Bernandized him might I add). Furthermore, why should my client believe PhillinDeBlanc is a police officer since he was identified as a Duke and not a Peace Officer by his in-game tag.

Any reasonable person in this situation might assume that a vigilante, and not a lawfully deputized Peace Officer, was trying to attack and possibly kidnap them!

It is the Defense's assertion that since PhillinDeBlanc didn't properly identify himself and didn't have a police or law enforcement tag before his name, no reasonable person could assume he was a peace officer and/or acting as one, and therefore my client was justified in trying to escape from what appeared to be an assault and detainment by a random particular individual.


Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
4/25/2026