Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
OPENING STATEMENT

I. INTRODUCTION
On April 7th, Defendant Thritystone unlawfully killed Capt11543, a former Prime Minister and sitting Member of Parliament. The former Prime Minister neither consented to this killing, nor had he enabled consent in-game. That same day, the Noble PhillinDeBlanc, Constable and Commander of the New Hamilton Police Department, attempted to lawfully detain and arrest the Defendant based on Ministry of Justice wanted records. Despite being ordered to freeze, the Defendant decided to flee from the arresting officer in an attempt to avoid the consequences of his illegal actions.

This case does not merely concern, as the Defense would have you believe, a true misunderstanding in which the Defendant fled to protect himself from the threat of vigilantism. The Defense has asked this Court to accept that a reasonable person, having Ministry of Justice issued equipment utilized against them, and having been issued an order to freeze from a New Hamilton Police Department Constable, would plausibly believe themselves to have been the victim of a vigilante attack. Rather, this case concerns a Defendant who unlawfully and brutally killed a former Prime Minister and cherished member of the Alexandrian community, and who, when justice came knocking at his door, did everything in his power to avoid accountability.

II. MURDER
The former Prime Minister, Capt11543, will testify directly to his own murder and the absence of any consent. Ministry of Justice records will further corroborate this testimony, establishing that Thritystone unlawfully killed Capt11543 without his consent, and did so with criminal intent. Under §7(1) of the Criminal Code Act, this conduct satisfies the statutory elements for Murder.

(1) Murder - A player is guilty of murder if they intentionally and knowingly, or with extreme recklessness, kill another player without consent from that player.
(a) Offense Type: Summary​
(b) Maximum Penalty: 4 Penalty Units fine + 30 minutes in jail​
Click to expand...

III. EVADING OR RESISTING ARREST
When, on the same day, the Defendant attempted to flee from a lawful arrest by the Noble PhillinDeBlanc, the circumstances were such that any reasonable person would have understood they were being placed under arrest. The arresting officer issued a lawful order to freeze and utilized Ministry of Justice issued equipment, including a taser and handcuffs. Under §10(13) of the Criminal Code Act, this conduct satisfies the statutory elements of Evading or Resisting Arrest.

(13) Evading or Resisting Arrest - A player is guilty of evading or resisting arrest if they attempt to escape from a peace officer when that peace officer is at that moment attempting to legally arrest or detain them.
(a) Offense Type: Summary​
(b) Maximum Penalty: 8 Penalty Units fine + 10 minutes in jail​
Click to expand...

IV. CONCLUSION
Following testimony, the evidence will speak plainly and unambiguously. This Court will hear from two witnesses, each of whom has a direct connection to this case. The first is the victim, who was murdered by the Defendant, and the second is the arresting officer, from whom the Defendant fled. The Ministry of Justice records in combination with this testimony will demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that Thritystone is guilty of both Murder and Evading or Resisting Arrest. The Crown invites this Court to consider the testimony which shall now be presented, reflect on the evidence introduced, and ultimately find the Defendant guilty as charged.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
OPENING STATEMENT


I. INTRODUCTION
The truth is what we should be looking for. Beyond the smoke and mirrors of opening statements that particular individuals have spent a long time carefully crafting, there is the truth: veritas. As in verification, because as of this time the Defense has not seen the Prosecution verify anything, and does not think they can without there being reason to doubt the veracity of the Prosecution's case.

The Defense does not argue that Thritystone didn't kill Capt11543, but rather that it wasn't an unlawful killing. The Defense does not argue there was a struggle between PhillinDeBlanc and Thritystone, but rather that it couldn't be resisting arrest. The evidence submitted so far does not speak to that, but upon witness testimony the Defense believes the truth of the matter will come out. Because the Prosecution from the testimony of its witnesses has to prove two big things in response to all off his charges: That the Defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, as per §4(1)(a) of A.P.04-019., and that his actions show a guilty mind and guilty action, meaning that he acted knowingly, intentionally, and that he acted in a defined way to commit the crime as per §2(3) of A.P.04-020.

That is checkbox #1 and #2. Let's go through the rest of check boxes for the other charges.


II. MURDER
The testimony of Capt11543 must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that my client's actions towards Capt was Murder, done with a guilty mind and guilty action. Specifically, guilty mind has to show it was done either Knowingly and Intentionally, or with "extreme" recklessness. This is all under the definition of Murder the Prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Keep that checkbox in mind during the testimony of Capt11543.


III. EVADING OR RESISTING ARREST
The testimony of PhillinDeBlanc must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that my client's actions during the botched detainment attempt was Resisting Arrest, and that this was all done with a guilty mind and guilty action.

The Prosecution and the Defense agrees on at least one thing: in this case The Defense does ask the court to put themselves into the Defendant's shoes as a reasonable person and see how it could be seen as a vigilante attack:

You are minding your own business, when suddenly you are tazed and then pepper sprayed. Then told to Freeze, and then handcuffed. What is going through a reasonable persons mind? When you see the person's role in-game is Noble and they are cuffing you, do you know who they are or what they represent? Can you knowingly commit resisting arrest if you do not know you are being arrested? Wouldn't you reasonably as a particular individual minding your own business want to get away from such a vicious assault?

Keep in mind that the above scenario is not imagined, it is the exact events that happened from the chat logs in Prosecution's Evidence #2 (P-002). Keep in mind that scenario and those questions when listening to PhillinDeBlanc's testimony. Another checkbox for the Prosecution to address.


IV. CONCLUSION
The Truth is what will set anybody free, and it is what I know will set my client free. He is innocent until proven guilty by this court of law, and it is the Prosecution's job to prove guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. If at any point during this testimony and reviewing the evidence as presented in this case, you can find yourself saying when seeing the Prosecution's point of view: "It could have happened that another way" or "That doesn't make sense" or "Those checkboxes don't seem to be checked off", that is reasonable doubt.

Keep in mind the Defense will be asking their own questions of the same witnesses the Prosecution is using to prove its case. If the evidence and testimony show the reasonable plausibility of the truth present Defense's case, that is enough under reasonable doubt to break the Prosecution's case. The court in that circumstance would ultimately have to find my client innocent of the charges he faces if any of those checkboxes are left unticked.


Respectfully Submitted,

ConsequencesInc
5/07/2026
 
Last edited:
@SoggehToast
We will now move on to what the Criminal Procedure Act calls your "case-in-chief."

I will issue a summons for the witnesses on your list. You will have 24 hours to question them following their appearance in court. Then, the defense will have 24 hours to cross examine your witnesses. Following that, I will issue a summons for the defense's witness list. They will have 24 hours to conduct questioning. Following that, you will have 24 hours to cross examine them.
 
MagistrateSeal.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS


@Capt11543 and @PhillinDeBlanc are commanded to appear before the Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in

Case 6 (Mag Ct., 2026)
Thritystone
Applicant/Defendant

v.

The Crown
Respondent/Prosecution


They are hereby required to do so within twenty-four (24) hours. Failure to do so may result in a contempt of court charge.

So ordered,
Magistrate Dogeington​
 
IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS

Dogeington said:
MagistrateSeal.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS


@Capt11543 and @PhillinDeBlanc are commanded to appear before the Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in

Case 6 (Mag Ct., 2026)
Thritystone
Applicant/Defendant

v.

The Crown
Respondent/Prosecution


They are hereby required to do so within twenty-four (24) hours. Failure to do so may result in a contempt of court charge.

So ordered,
Magistrate Dogeington​
Click to expand...

Checking in, Your Honor.

Respectfully submitted,
Capt11543
 
Dogeington said:
MagistrateSeal.png
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
WRIT OF SUMMONS


@Capt11543 and @PhillinDeBlanc are commanded to appear before the Magistrates Court of the Kingdom of Alexandria in

Case 6 (Mag Ct., 2026)
Thritystone
Applicant/Defendant

v.

The Crown
Respondent/Prosecution


They are hereby required to do so within twenty-four (24) hours. Failure to do so may result in a contempt of court charge.

So ordered,
Magistrate Dogeington​
Click to expand...
IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO SUMMONS

Present, Your Honour.

Nobley submitted,
The Noble, PhilAnthropy
Duke
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
QUESTIONS FOR WITNESSES

For @Capt11543:

1. P-002 reflect that you were killed by Thritystone on or around April 7th. Please identify, to the best of your knowledge, the interaction that gave rise to this record.
2. Did any violent encounters occur between you and the Defendant on or around April 7th? If so, please describe your recollection of those events, including the moments leading up to and following the encounter.
3. To the best of your knowledge, did you have consent enabled in-game on or around April 7th?
4. To the best of your knowledge, did you at any point on April 7th give the Defendant explicit consent to kill you?

For the Noble @PhillinDeBlanc:

1. P-001 includes your Officer Witness Statement, in which you describe the Defendant as having “escaped” following his arrest. Please describe the events leading up to the incident you reported on, and the actions taken by yourself and the Defendant thereafter, up until the Defendant was sent to the Alexandrian jail.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top