Lawsuit: In Session Thritystone v. Crown, Case 6 (Mag. Ct., 2026)

ConsequencesInc said:
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS


@Capt11543

4. While I know you cannot recall exactly how long it was before the Defendant encountered you, can you clarify the exact timeline of events that happened after the initial encounter?

5. It sounds like typically you were pretty well armored and in good health when the incident took place. Are you sure that it was only one arrow shot that killed you?

6. There were no police present who responded when the incident took place and you used /999. With that in mind, prior to the Defendant's arrest on April 8th, were you ever interviewed or questioned by any member of the Police Department or the MoJ regarding your encounter with the Defendant?


@PhillinDeBlanc

9. Since you did not do any of the investigating yourself and were not aware of the case details, how did you make the determination at the defendant's arrest that it was murder he committed and not something else, say manslaughter or lawful self-defense or mutual combat?

10. Please refresh yourself with Prosecution's Exhibit 2 (P-002). Note that the message generated by the solved case states only who solved the case, and that Capt11543 was the victim and the defendant was the killer. There is no mention of murder. Given your extensive experience with the New Hamilton Police Department both as a Constable, Detective and now a Captain, I have to ask: do you know for sure that a solved detective case that generates a wanted star is for sure, and without a reasonable doubt, meets the legal definition and burden of proof of a murder?

11. Noble Captain PhillinDeBlanc, please answer the question and please refresh yourself with Prosecution's Exhibit 1 (P-001). I did not ask if you concealed your identity from the Defendant because you clearly believe you didn't, yet the chatlogs in P-001 and your own testimony that "I suspected he might run if I announce my intention to arrest him" during the Prosecution's questioning, show that you were not forthcoming about your presence to the Defendant: You testified that you did not announce your intention to arrest him and P-001 shows you did not have a Police Role on. With the evidence and testimony currently in record, it is not clear that you made any effort to identify your self in any way, shape or form as a Peace Officer.

Which is why I asked you originally and will ask you once again to clarify for the Court on the record so we may all know: How did you identify yourself and make your presence known to the Defendant before you tried to detain him?

12. So MoJ issued equipment is not available to the public. Is there any Ministry of Justice issued equipment that is currently unaccounted for that is not under MoJ or MoJ authorized employee control?



Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/16/2026
Click to expand...


9. The plugin accounts for self defense. If a player kills another in self defense, the plugin does not register it as murder. Furthermore, players have the option to do /police consent if they wish to engage in consensual combat. With police consent activated, they do not drop clues when they die.

10. The /wanted plugin shows us the reason for the charges. The charge very clearly said "Murder of Capt11543"

11. I gave the suspect the amount of notification required of me by law and ministry policy. No more, no less.

12. To the best of my knowledge, no.
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE

Your Honor,

I will be unavailable until Wednesday due to IRL obligations. Additionally, we are presently in the midst of elections, and the current Government, including my position as Minister of Justice, is set to dissolve on or around May 25th following the conclusion of the voting period, according to Entreaty for Prior Ponderance VI (Ch. 2025).

I respectfully request that any future filing expectations and obligations on the part of the Crown be continued until 72 hours after the formation of a new Government. I apologize for any disruptions this may cause.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
ENTREATY OF STRIKING AND ADMONISHING

Your Honor,

The Defense moves that the Court strikes Noble PhillinDeBlanc's answer to questions #9 and #10 due to being non-responsive, and that the Court directs him to answer the questions.

In Question #9, The plugin has nothing to do with the question that was asked of the witness, which was how did he personally make the determination at the defendant's arrest that it was murder and not something else.

In Question #10, the Defense did not ask what the wanted star shows. The witness was asked if a wanted star for sure, and without a reasonable doubt, meets the legal definition and burden of proof of a murder.

If the witness does not know or is unsure of the answers to these specific questions and the complexities involved, the Defense is okay with hearing "I do not know" as an answer instead of irrelevant testimony.

The Defense also humbly requests that the Court officially admonish the Noble Constable as a particular individual for being non-responsive to multiple questions being asked of him both now and previously, as he is now starting to waste both the Defense's and the Court's time.


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/25/2026
 
Last edited:
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS

@PhillinDeBlanc

13. What is the the amount of notification required of you by law and ministry policy to give the suspect?

14. To clarify, is it your testimony here today that there is currently no Ministry of Justice issued equipment in the hands of unauthorized individuals at this moment?


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/25/2026
 
ConsequencesInc said:
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS

@PhillinDeBlanc

13. What is the the amount of notification required of you by law and ministry policy to give the suspect?

14. To clarify, is it your testimony here today that there is currently no Ministry of Justice issued equipment in the hands of unauthorized individuals at this moment?


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/25/2026
Click to expand...


13. Under Alexandrian Law and Ministry of Justice policy, Constables are not required to give notification to suspects of murder until after they cuff them.

14. You have asked this question now 3 times. Please stop wasting the court's time and refer to my previous answer.
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
ENTREATY OF STRIKING AND WARNING

Your Honor,

The Defense requests that the answer to Question 14 be struck as non-responsive, and that the Court directs the witness to answer the question. It is a yes or no question confirming his testimony, it shouldn't be too hard for the witness to put this to rest if "I've asked this question 3 times" with a simple response.

I would also request that the Court remind the witness that he is still under oath.


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/25/2026
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS

15. Is it your testimony here today that you did not notify and identify to the Defendant that you were a police officer before you cuffed him?

16. Did you ever notify and identify yourself as a police officer to the Defendant between the time that you cuffed him and when he escaped from your hand cuffs?


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/25/2026
 
SoggehToast said:
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
ENTREATY OF CONTINUANCE

Your Honor,

I will be unavailable until Wednesday due to IRL obligations. Additionally, we are presently in the midst of elections, and the current Government, including my position as Minister of Justice, is set to dissolve on or around May 25th following the conclusion of the voting period, according to Entreaty for Prior Ponderance VI (Ch. 2025).

I respectfully request that any future filing expectations and obligations on the part of the Crown be continued until 72 hours after the formation of a new Government. I apologize for any disruptions this may cause.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Minister of Justice
Kingdom of Alexandria
Click to expand...
Accepted
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATE

Your Honor,

I am not presently serving as the Crown Counsel for this case, as I am no longer Minister of Justice. I will attempt to coordinate with the Ministry on this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Deputy Prime Minister
Kingdom of Alexandria
 
ConsequencesInc said:
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS

15. Is it your testimony here today that you did not notify and identify to the Defendant that you were a police officer before you cuffed him?

16. Did you ever notify and identify yourself as a police officer to the Defendant between the time that you cuffed him and when he escaped from your hand cuffs?


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/25/2026
Click to expand...

15. I am invoking my right to remain silent.

16. I am invoking my right to remain silent.
 
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
RESPONSE TO ENTREATY OF STRIKING, ADMONISHING, AND WARNING
OBJECTIONS TO QUESTIONS

Your Honor,

It appears I will be back as acting Crown Counsel for the duration of this case. I have attached proof of authorization to continue this case below.

In Question #9, The plugin has nothing to do with the question that was asked of the witness, which was how did he personally make the determination at the defendant's arrest that it was murder and not something else.
Click to expand...
The Defense asked how the witness made the determination at the Defendants arrest that they had committed murder and not self defense. The Noble PhillinDeBlanc clearly indicated that he was able to make this determination because the plugin does not register cases of self-defense as murder. This answer was not non-responsive, it was simply a response that the Defense did not like because it harms their case.

In Question #10, the Defense did not ask what the wanted star shows. The witness was asked if a wanted star for sure, and without a reasonable doubt, meets the legal definition and burden of proof of a murder.
Click to expand...
The Noble PhillinDeBlanc's response, when taken into context with the Homeland Security Murder Plugin Staff Veto, clearly answers this question. The plugin indicated clearly and unambiguously that Thritystone murdered Capt11543. If we assume the plugin, as the DemocracyCraft Staff Vetos page provides, is to be considered presumptively correct as evidence, the witness's answer cannot be plausibly construed as non-responsive.

OBJECTION - ASKED AND ANSWERED
14. To clarify, is it your testimony here today that there is currently no Ministry of Justice issued equipment in the hands of unauthorized individuals at this moment?
Click to expand...
The Crown does not oppose the Entreaty of Striking (#67), but we do oppose the Entreaty for Warning. Questions 8, 12, and 14 are identical, and the witness should not be penalized for pointing that out. The Crown respectfully requests that, rather than strike the witness's response alone, the Court strikes both questions 12 and 14 in their entirety.

Respectfully submitted,

Soggeh T. Oast
Deputy Prime Minister
Kingdom of Alexandria
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-05-31 234301.png
    Screenshot 2026-05-31 234301.png
    38.2 KB · Views: 3
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION


Your honor,

The Defense finds the Crown's objection persuasive, and will acquiesce to the Crown's proposed solution of striking questions 12 and 14.


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/331/2026
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
ENTREATY FOR IMMUNITY

PhillinDeBlanc said:
15. I am invoking my right to remain silent.

16. I am invoking my right to remain silent.
Click to expand...


Your honor,

While the witnesses does have his right to remain silent, I believe that there are options for the Court to consider.

The witnesses' right to not self-incriminate is important, and his testimony on these questions will also be important to determining my client's innocence. I think this is the best way to ensure the witness still can testify today.

I move that the Court request that the Crown grants the witness transactional immunity so that the he cannot be charged with a crime related to his conduct during Thritystone's arrest, and that if the Crown refuses that the Court grant the witness derivative use immunity so that his testimony in response to these questions cannot be used as evidence against him.


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/331/2026
 
IN THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA
CRIMINAL ACTION
Case No.: 6
ENTREATY TO INTRODUCE IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE


Your honor,

Given the Noble PhillinDeBlanc's answer to question 8 posed to him, the Defense wishes to introduce impeachment evidence at this time that directly contradicts the witness' sworn statement. The Defense will wait for a response from the Crown and the Court's ruling before presenting it.


Submitted Respectfully,

∴ ⨿🝛
The Artist Formerly Known as ConsequencesInc
5/331/2026
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top