Search results

Lovely. You have forty-eight.

You require an extension to appear before court?

Granted. Forty-eight hours from current deadline.

This case is now in recess pending verdict.

This case is in recess. This is denied.

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA WRIT OF SUMMONS The Crown's rightfully appointed counsel is instructed to appear within seventy-two hours.

In a 2-0 decision, the Chancery dismisses this case. It is clear the plaintiff re-filed this suit in its entirety, adding new plaintiffs. In the future, the Chancery asks in similar situations plaintiffs simply move to add other plaintiffs.

In a 2-0 vote, the Chancery denies this appeal. The underlying law no longer is in force, and there is no basis for a claim to appeal.

The Crown (@SoggehToast) shall have seventy-two hours to file their closing statement.

In a 2-0 vote, the Chancery implements Rule 1 to this case. High Chancellor Smallfries is assigned as presiding officer.

Discovery is now over. Given the extended time that has elapsed since any movement from this proceeding, in a 2-0 vote the Chancery has decided to deny all outstanding motions. Parties are free to re-file any motion without penalty or scorn. Discovery submission P-009 is invalid, as it was...

I'm sorry, but as a private citizen suing in a private matter, you do not have standing to ask for clarification on this subject. It is a matter wholly unrelated to you and your issues here.

IN THE CHANCERY OF THE KINGDOM OF ALEXANDRIA RESPONSE TO WRIT Defendant here asks the Chancery to recuse Magistrate Gribble19 for "bias and past encounters." The Defendant has provided no evidence of such bias or record of such encounters. I have absolutely no evidence, record, or justification...

This is granted.

This case has no presiding officer, and none can be assigned as only one seat is filled in the Chancery. No answer can be given to this request. If Parliament appoints a second uninterested Chancellor, or gives me authority to either rule on my own or promulgate new rules as I see fit, this case...

This objection is sustained in part. The Crown is clearly late in their response, and did not ask for an extension. While the Court understands very clearly the manpower issues and is sympathetic, it is necessary to hold the Crown in contempt, and fine them £100. However, it would be ridiculous...

Please explain what exactly this is.

The Crown shall have seventy-two hours to submit its closing statement.

This is denied. The Chancery will look into future methods of structuring witness questioning in the hopes of preventing these drawn out periods in the future. This is granted in part. All dialogue after the second question will be struck from the record. The courts are not a place to campaign...

@Thritystone